Abstract:Understanding the evolution of human social systems requires flexible formalisms for the emergence of institutions. Although game theory is normally used to model interactions individually, larger spaces of games can be helpful for modeling how interactions change. We introduce a framework for modeling "institutional evolution," how individuals change the games they are placed in. We contrast this with the more familiar within-game "behavioral evolution". Starting from an initial game, agents trace trajectories through game space by repeatedly navigating to more preferable games until they converge on attractor games that are preferred to all others. Agents choose between games on the basis of their "institutional preferences," which define between-game comparisons in terms of game-level features such as stability, fairness, and efficiency. Computing institutional change trajectories over the two-player space, we find that the attractors of self-interested economic agents over-represent fairness by 100% relative to baseline, even though those agents are indifferent to fairness. This seems to occur because fairness, as a game feature, co-occurs with the self-serving features these agents do prefer. We thus present institutional evolution as a mechanism for encouraging the spontaneous emergence of cooperation among inherently selfish agents. We then extend these findings beyond two players, and to two other types of evolutionary agent: the relative fitness maximizing agent of evolutionary game theory (who maximizes inequality), and the relative group fitness maximizing agent of multi-level/group selection theory (who minimizes inequality). This work provides a flexible, testable formalism for modeling the interdependencies of behavioral and institutional evolutionary processes.

Institutional Screening and the Sustainability of Conditional Cooperation

Cooperation and Charity in Spatial Public Goods Game under Different Strategy Update Rules

Institutional Incentives for the Evolution of Committed Cooperation: Ensuring Participation is as Important as Enhancing Compliance

Cooperation induced by wise incentive allocation in spontaneous institution

Evolution of commitment in the spatial public goods game through institutional incentives

The Evolution of Cooperation in Spatial Multigame with Voluntary Participation

The evolution of cooperation through institutional incentives and optional participation

Cost efficiency of institutional incentives for promoting cooperation in finite populations

Cooperation under Institutional Incentives with Perfect and Imperfect Observation

Cost optimisation of hybrid institutional incentives for promoting cooperation in finite populations

A dynamic over games drives selfish agents to win-win outcomes

Institutional Preferences, Social Preferences and Cooperation: Evidence from a Lab-in-the-field Experiment in Rural China

Sanctioning by Institution, Skepticism of Punisher and the Evolution of Cooperation

Social Stratification and Cooperative Behavior in Spatial Prisoners' Dilemma Games

Reputation-Based Conditional Interaction Supports Cooperation in Well-Mixed Prisoner’s Dilemmas

Does Spending More Always Ensure Higher Cooperation? An Analysis of Institutional Incentives on Heterogeneous Networks

Source-sink cooperation dynamics constrain institutional evolution in a group-structured society

Optimal Distribution of Incentives for Public Cooperation in Heterogeneous Interaction Environments.

Evolution of Interactions and Cooperation in the Spatial Prisoner's Dilemma Game

Social preferences and the variability of conditional cooperation