Abstract:Third-party punishment is a common mechanism to promote cooperation in humans. Theoretical models of evolution of cooperation predict that punishment maintains cooperation if it is sufficiently frequent. On the other hand, empirical studies have found that participants frequently punishing others do not success in comparison with those not eager to punish others, suggesting that punishment is suboptimal and thus should not be frequent. That being the case, our question is what mechanism, if any, can sustain cooperation even if punishment is rare. The present study proposes that one possible mechanism is risk-averse social learning. Using the method of evolutionary game dynamics, we investigate the effect of risk attitude of individuals on the question. In our framework, individuals select a strategy based on its risk, i.e., the variance of the payoff, as well as its expected payoff; risk-averse individuals prefer to select a strategy with low variable payoff. Using the framework, we examine the evolution of cooperation in two-player social dilemma games with punishment. We study two models: cooperators and defectors compete, while defectors may be punished by an exogenous authority; and cooperators, defectors, and cooperative punishers compete, while defectors may be punished by the cooperative punishers. We find that in both models, risk-averse individuals achieve stable cooperation with significantly low frequency of punishment. We also examine three punishment variants: in each game, all defectors are punished; only one of defectors is punished; and only a defector who exploits a cooperator or a cooperative punisher is punished. We find that the first and second variants effectively promote cooperation. Comparing the first and second variants, each can be more effective than the other depending on punishment frequency.

Sanctioning by Institution, Skepticism of Punisher and the Evolution of Cooperation

Revisiting institutional punishment in the $N$-person prisoner's dilemma

Sanctions as honest signals--the evolution of pool punishment by public sanctioning institutions

Preemptive punishment and the emergence of sanctioning institutions

Negative Feedback Punishment Approach Helps Sanctioning Institutions Achieve Stable, Time-Saving and Low-Cost Performances

Self-organization of punishment in structured populations

The Role of Opportunistic Punishment in the Evolution of Cooperation: An application of stochastic dynamics to public good game

Evolutionary dynamics of cooperation in a population with probabilistic corrupt enforcers and violators

Effectiveness of conditional punishment for the evolution of public cooperation

The evolution of punishing institutions

Facilitating the evolution of cooperation through altruistic punishment with adaptive feedback

The evolution of cooperation through institutional incentives and optional participation

Cooperation induced by wise incentive allocation in spontaneous institution

Conditional Punishment: Descriptive Social Norms Drive Negative Reciprocity

Probabilistic sharing solves the problem of costly punishment

Institutional Incentives for the Evolution of Committed Cooperation: Ensuring Participation is as Important as Enhancing Compliance

Sustainable institutionalized punishment requires elimination of second-order free-riders

Rare Third-Party Punishment Promotes Cooperation in Risk-Averse Social Learning Dynamics

Evolutionary dynamics of cooperation driven by incentives

Promote or hinder? The role of punishment in the emergence of cooperation

The effect of distribution of fines on the evolution of cooperation in spatial public goods game