Abstract:Insertion and deletion (insdel for short) codes have recently attracted a lot of attention due to their applications in many interesting fields such as DNA storage, DNA analysis, race-track memory error correction and language processing. The present paper mainly studies limits and constructions of insdel codes. The paper can be divided into two parts. The first part focuses on various bounds, while the second part concentrates on constructions of insdel codes. Although the insdel-metric Singleton bound has been derived before, it is still unknown if there are any nontrivial codes achieving this bound. Our first result shows that any nontrivial insdel codes do not achieve the insdel-metric Singleton bound. The second bound shows that every $[n,k]$ Reed-Solomon code has insdel distance upper bounded by $2n-4k+4$ and it is known in literature that an $[n,k]$ Reed-Solomon code can have insdel distance $2n-4k+4$ as long as the field size is sufficiently large. The third bound shows a trade-off between insdel distance and code alphabet size for codes achieving the Hamming-metric Singleton bound. In the second part of the paper, we first provide a non-explicit construction of nonlinear codes that can approach the insdel-metric Singleton bound arbitrarily when the code alphabet size is sufficiently large. The second construction gives two-dimensional Reed-Solomon codes of length $n$ and insdel distance $2n-4$ with field size $q=O(n^{5})$ . The non-explicit construction of insdel codes is based on constant-weight $L^{1}$ -codes that are introduced in this paper. We first establish a relation between constant-weight $L^{1}$ -codes and insdel codes. Based on this relation, we construct constant-weight $L^{1}$ -codes with reasonable parameters and subsequently give insdel codes approaching the insdel-metric Singleton bound. Via automorphism group of rational function field, we provide a necessary and sufficient condition under which a two-dimensional Reed-Solomon code of length $n$ has insdel distance $2n-4$ . Based on this criterion, we present a construction of $q$ -ary two-dimensional Reed-Solomon codes of length $n$ and insdel distance $2n-4$ with $q=O(n^{5})$ . Though this is worse than the current best field size, we provide a new angle to look into the problem.

Optimal Two-Dimensional Reed--Solomon Codes Correcting Insertions and Deletions

Improved Singleton bound on insertion-deletion codes and optimal constructions

Random Reed-Solomon Codes Achieve the Half-Singleton Bound for Insertions and Deletions over Linear-Sized Alphabets

Explicit Constructions of Two-Dimensional Reed-Solomon Codes in High Insertion and Deletion Noise Regime

Bounds and Constructions for Insertion and Deletion Codes

The repair problem for Reed-Solomon codes: Optimal repair of single and multiple erasures, asymptotically optimal node size

Optimal repairing schemes for Reed-Solomon codes with alphabet sizes linear in lengths under the rack-aware model

Repairing Reed-Solomon Codes With Two Erasures

Improved List-Decodability of Reed--Solomon Codes via Tree Packings

Randomly punctured Reed--Solomon codes achieve list-decoding capacity over linear-sized fields

Optimal Locally Repairable Codes Via Elliptic Curves

Efficient Interpolation-Based Decoding of Reed-Solomon Codes

On the Sub-Packetization Size and the Repair Bandwidth of Reed-Solomon Codes

Improved List-Decodability and List-Recoverability of Reed–Solomon Codes via Tree Packings

An Optimal Sequence Reconstruction Algorithm for Reed-Solomon Codes

Binary Codes for Correcting Two Edits

List Decoding Reed-Solomon, Algebraic-Geometric, and Gabidulin Subcodes Up to the Singleton Bound.

New constructions of optimal $(r,δ)$-LRCs via good polynomials

Explicit Subcodes of Reed-Solomon Codes that Efficiently Achieve List Decoding Capacity

Repairing Reed-Solomon Codes over Prime Fields via Exponential Sums