Abstract:We give new constructions of two classes of algebraic code families that are efficiently list decodable with small output list size from a fraction 1-R-ε of adversarial errors, where R is the rate of the code, for any desired positive constant ε. The alphabet size depends only ε and is nearly optimal. The first class of codes are obtained by folding algebraic-geometric codes using automorphisms of the underlying function field. The second class of codes are obtained by restricting evaluation points of an algebraic-geometric code to rational points from a subfield . In both cases, we develop a linear-algebraic approach to perform list decoding, which pins down the candidate messages to a subspace with a nice “periodic” structure. To prune this subspace and obtain a good bound on the list size, we pick subcodes of these codes by pre-coding into certain subspace-evasive sets that are guaranteed to have small intersection with the sort of periodic subspaces that arise in our list decoding. We develop two approaches for constructing such subspace-evasive sets. The first is a Monte Carlo construction of hierearchical subspace-evasive (h.s.e.) sets that leads to excellent list size but is not explicit. The second approach exploits a further ultra-periodicity of our subspaces and uses a novel construct called subspace designs , which were subsequently constructed explicitly and also found further applications in pseudorandomness. To get a family of codes over a fixed alphabet size, we instantiate our approach with algebraic-geometric codes based on the Garcia–Stichtenoth tower of function fields. Combining this with pruning via h.s.e. sets yields codes list-decodable up to a 1-R-ε error fraction with list size bounded by O (1/ε), matching the existential bound for random codes up to constant factors. Further, the alphabet size can be made exp ( Õ (1/ε 2 )), which is not much worse than the lower bound of exp (Ω (1/ε)). The parameters we achieve are thus quite close to the existential bounds in all three aspects (error-correction radius, alphabet size, and list size) simultaneously. This construction is, however, Monte Carlo and the claimed list-decoding property only holds with high probability. Once the code is (efficiently) sampled, the encoding/decoding algorithms are deterministic with a running time O _ε ( N c ) for an absolute constant c , where N is the code’s block length. Using subspace designs instead for the pruning, our approach yields the first deterministic construction of an algebraic code family of rate R with efficient list decoding from 1-R-ε fraction of errors over an alphabet of constant size exp (Õ(1/ε 2 )). The list-size bound is upper bounded by a very slowly growing function of the block length N ; in particular, it is at most O(log ( r ) N ) (the r th iterated logarithm) for any fixed integer r . The explicit construction avoids the shortcoming of the Monte Carlo sampling at the expense of a slightly worse list size.

Randomly punctured Reed--Solomon codes achieve list-decoding capacity over linear-sized fields

Randomly Punctured Reed-Solomon Codes Achieve the List Decoding Capacity over Polynomial-Size Alphabets

Improved List-Decodability of Reed--Solomon Codes via Tree Packings

Random Reed-Solomon Codes Achieve the Half-Singleton Bound for Insertions and Deletions over Linear-Sized Alphabets

Improved List-Decodability and List-Recoverability of Reed–Solomon Codes via Tree Packings

Efficient List-decoding of Polynomial Ideal Codes with Optimal List Size

Combinatorial list-decoding of Reed-Solomon codes beyond the Johnson radius

List Decoding Reed-Solomon, Algebraic-Geometric, and Gabidulin Subcodes Up to the Singleton Bound.

Explicit Subcodes of Reed-Solomon Codes that Efficiently Achieve List Decoding Capacity

List-decoding and list-recovery of Reed-Solomon codes beyond the Johnson radius for any rate

Pseudorandom Linear Codes are List Decodable to Capacity

Fast list-decoding of univariate multiplicity and folded Reed-Solomon codes

AG Codes Achieve List-decoding Capacity over Constant-sized Fields

Folded Codes from Function Field Towers and Improved Optimal Rate List Decoding

Random Reed-Solomon Codes are List Recoverable with Optimal List Size

Random Reed-Solomon Codes and Random Linear Codes are Locally Equivalent

Randomness-Efficient Constructions of Capacity-Achieving List-Decodable Codes

Generic Reed-Solomon Codes Achieve List-decoding Capacity

Threshold Rates of Code Ensembles: Linear is Best

Optimal Rate List Decoding over Bounded Alphabets Using Algebraic-Geometric Codes.

Distance Distribution in Reed-Solomon Codes