How quantum mechanics requires non-additive measures

Gabriele Carcassi,Christine A. Aidala
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/e25121670
2023-11-03
Abstract:Measure theory is used in physics, not just to capture classical probability, but also to quantify the number of states. In previous works, we found that state quantification plays a foundational role in classical mechanics, and therefore, we set ourselves to construct the quantum equivalent of the Liouville measure. Unlike the classical counterpart, this quantized measure is non-additive and has a unitary lower bound (i.e. no set of states can have less than one state). Conversely, requiring that state quantification is finite for finite continuous regions and that each state counts as one already implies non-additivity, which in turn implies the failure of classical theory. In this article we show these preliminary results and outline a new line of inquiry that may provide a different insight into the foundations of quantum theory. Additionally, this new approach may prove to be useful to those interested in a quantized theory of space-time, as we believe this requires a quantized measure for the quantification of the independent degrees of freedom.
Quantum Physics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### What problems does this paper attempt to solve? This paper explores the problem of state quantification in quantum mechanics, especially how to define a non - additive measure in quantum theory. Specifically, the paper attempts to solve the following key problems: 1. **Differences between classical and quantum measures**: - In classical mechanics, the Liouville measure is used to quantify states in phase space. However, state quantification in quantum mechanics does not follow the classical additive measure. The paper attempts to construct an equivalent measure in quantum mechanics and explain why this measure must be non - additive. 2. **Physical meaning of non - additive measures**: - By studying entropy in statistical mechanics and information theory (such as Shannon entropy, Gibbs entropy, and von Neumann entropy), the paper explores the relationship between non - additive measures and entropy. This helps to understand why the quantification of quantum states cannot simply use the classical probability measure. 3. **Contextuality and non - additivity**: - The paper discusses the influence of contextuality on measure non - additivity. In quantum mechanics, the choice of different measurement bases will lead to different sets of states, and the number of states in these sets cannot be simply added. Therefore, the non - additive measure reflects the context - dependent characteristics of the quantum system. 4. **Relationship between quantization and non - additive measures**: - The paper explores the essence of quantization, that is, ensuring that each state is quantified to at least one unit (unitary lower bound). To achieve this, the measure must be non - additive. This not only solves the limitations of classical probability theory but also reveals the deep - seated connection between quantization and contextuality. 5. **Possibility of space - time quantization**: - The paper further explores the possibility of applying non - additive measures to space - time quantization. The author believes that space - time quantization means quantifying the number of degrees of freedom, and this quantization should also be non - additive to avoid degrees of freedom less than one unit. ### Summary The core problem of the paper is: how to define a reasonable state - quantification measure in quantum mechanics and explain the physical meaning of its non - additivity. Through this research, the author hopes to provide new insights into the foundation of quantum theory and important mathematical tools for the development of future physical theories.