Walter F. Wreszinski
Abstract:We propose a theory of quantum (statistical) measurement which is close, in
spirit, to Hepp's theory, which is centered on the concepts of decoherence and
macroscopic (classical) observables, and apply it to a model of the
Stern-Gerlach experiment. The number N of degrees of freedom of the measuring
apparatus is such that $N \to \infty$, justifying the adjective "statistical",
but, in addition, and in contrast to Hepp's approach, we make a three-fold
assumption: the measurement is not instantaneous, it lasts a finite amount of
time and is, up to arbitrary accuracy, performed in a finite region of space,
in agreement with the additional axioms proposed by Basdevant and Dalibard. It
is then shown how von Neumann's "collapse postulate" may be avoided by a
mathematically precise formulation of an argument of Gottfried, and, at the
same time, Heisenbeg's "destruction of knowledge" paradox is eliminated. The
fact that no irreversibility is attached to the process of measurement is shown
to follow from the author's theory of irreversibility, formulated in terms of
the mean entropy, due to the latter's property of affinity.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper attempts to solve several key problems in quantum measurement theory. Specifically:
1. **Non - instantaneous measurement**: Different from the traditional assumption, the author proposes that the measurement process is not completed instantaneously, but lasts for a finite time \(T\), and is carried out within a finite spatial region. This is in line with the additional axioms proposed by Basdevant and Dalibard.
2. **Avoiding von Neumann's collapse hypothesis**: Through mathematically precise formulation, the author shows how to avoid von Neumann's "collapse hypothesis". Specifically, using Gottfried's argument, it is illustrated that under certain conditions, the collapse of the quantum state is not necessary.
3. **Eliminating Heisenberg's knowledge - destruction paradox**: The author eliminates Heisenberg's "knowledge - destruction paradox" through his theory, that is, each experiment will destroy some system knowledge obtained from previous experiments.
4. **Reversibility of the measurement process**: The author proves that the measurement process itself does not carry irreversibility. This is based on his theory of irreversibility, which is described by the average entropy, and due to the affinity characteristics of the average entropy, the measurement process is reversible.
5. **The role of macroscopic observables**: The paper emphasizes the important role played by macroscopic (or classical) observables in the measurement process. These observables include the average magnetization of magnets, the center - of - mass coordinates of particle systems, etc. As the degree of freedom \(N\) approaches infinity, these observables can be well - defined.
6. **The existence of the arrow of time**: The author discusses that if the preparation and measurement of the system are regarded as instantaneous processes, the arrow of time may not exist, which is crucial for the precise formulation of the irreversibility conditions.
7. **The average entropy of infinite - dimensional quantum spin systems**: The author proves that during the measurement process, the average entropy is conserved on average, thus confirming van Kampen's conjecture that the entropy of the universe remains zero throughout the measurement process. This solves the "irreversibility paradox" proposed by Landau and Lifshitz and Gottfried.
In summary, this paper aims to solve the core problems in quantum measurement theory regarding measurement time, spatial scope, state collapse, knowledge - destruction paradox, and irreversibility by introducing new assumptions and frameworks.