Abstract:In the field of Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials (MLIPs), understanding the intricate relationship between data biases, specifically conformational and structural diversity, and model generalization is critical in improving the quality of Quantum Mechanics (QM) data generation efforts. We investigate these dynamics through two distinct experiments: a fixed budget one, where the dataset size remains constant, and a fixed molecular set one, which focuses on fixed structural diversity while varying conformational diversity. Our results reveal nuanced patterns in generalization metrics. Notably, for optimal structural and conformational generalization, a careful balance between structural and conformational diversity is required, but existing QM datasets do not meet that trade-off. Additionally, our results highlight the limitation of the MLIP models at generalizing beyond their training distribution, emphasizing the importance of defining applicability domain during model deployment. These findings provide valuable insights and guidelines for QM data generation efforts.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper primarily explores the role of Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials (MLIPs) in the generation of Quantum Mechanics (QM) data, particularly the impact of structural diversity and conformational diversity on the generalization ability of the models. The study investigates the complex relationship between these factors through two experimental designs: 1. **Fixed Budget Experiment**: In this experiment, the size of the dataset remains constant, while the number of molecules (structural diversity) and the number of conformations per molecule (conformational diversity) vary inversely. The study finds that, under a limited dataset size, excessively increasing conformational diversity at the expense of structural diversity leads to a significant decline in the model's structural generalization ability. 2. **Fixed Structural Diversity Experiment**: In this experiment, structural diversity is fixed while conformational diversity varies. The results show that when structural diversity is low, increasing conformational diversity can bring certain benefits; however, as structural diversity increases, the advantages brought by additional conformational diversity gradually diminish. Through these two experiments, the authors conclude that to achieve optimal structural and conformational generalization ability, a fine balance between structural diversity and conformational diversity needs to be found. However, existing QM datasets do not achieve this balance. Additionally, the study emphasizes the limitations of MLIP models in generalizing beyond the training distribution, highlighting the importance of defining the model's applicability domain. In summary, this paper aims to address how to optimize structural diversity and conformational diversity in the generation of QM data to improve the generalization performance of MLIP models, providing valuable insights and guidance for future QM data generation efforts.

Role of Structural and Conformational Diversity for Machine Learning Potentials

Learning Together: Towards foundational models for machine learning interatomic potentials with meta-learning

A Theoretical Case Study of the Generalisation of Machine-learned Potentials

Learning together: Towards foundation models for machine learning interatomic potentials with meta-learning

Modern Semiempirical Electronic Structure Methods and Machine Learning Potentials for Drug Discovery: Conformers, Tautomers, and Protonation States

Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials and Long-Range Physics

A theoretical case study of the generalization of machine-learned potentials

When More Data Hurts: Optimizing Data Coverage While Mitigating Diversity Induced Underfitting in an Ultra-Fast Machine-Learned Potential

Benchmarking Structural Evolution Methods for Training of Machine Learned Interatomic Potentials

Optimizing Training Data Set for the Machine Learning Potential of Li-Si Alloys via Structural Similarity-based Screening

Interpolation and differentiation of alchemical degrees of freedom in machine learning interatomic potentials

The confluence of machine learning and multiscale simulations

Machine learning potentials with Iterative Boltzmann Inversion: training to experiment

Robust Training of Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials with Dimensionality Reduction and Stratified Sampling

Machine learning interatomic potential: Bridge the gap between small-scale models and realistic device-scale simulations

Stable and Accurate Atomistic Simulations of Flexible Molecules using Conformationally Generalisable Machine Learned Potentials

Learning from models: high-dimensional analyses on the performance of machine learning interatomic potentials

Transferability of datasets between Machine-Learning Interaction Potentials

Machine Learning in QM/MM Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Condensed-Phase Systems

On the role of gradients for machine learning of molecular energies and forces