Abstract:With the emergence of Foundational Machine Learning Interatomic Potential (FMLIP) models trained on extensive datasets, transferring data between different ML architectures has become increasingly important. In this work, we examine the extent to which training data optimised for one machine-learning forcefield algorithm may be re-used to train different models, aiming to accelerate FMLIP fine-tuning and to reduce the need for costly iterative training. As a test case, we train models of an organic liquid mixture that is commonly used as a solvent in rechargeable battery electrolytes, making it an important target for reactive MLIP development. We assess model performance by analysing the properties of molecular dynamics trajectories, showing that this is a more stringent test than comparing prediction errors for fixed datasets. We consider several types of training data, and several popular MLIPs - notably the recent MACE architecture, a message-passing neural network designed for high efficiency and smoothness. We demonstrate that simple training sets constructed without any ab initio dynamics are sufficient to produce stable models of molecular liquids. For simple neural-network architectures, further iterative training is required to capture thermodynamic and kinetic properties correctly, but MACE performs well with extremely limited datsets. We find that configurations designed by human intuition to correct systematic model deficiencies transfer effectively between algorithms, but active-learned data that are generated by one MLIP do not typically benefit a different algorithm. Finally, we show that any training data which improve model performance also improve its ability to generalise to similar unseen molecules. This suggests that trajectory failure modes are connected with chemical structure rather than being entirely system-specific.

Learning from models: high-dimensional analyses on the performance of machine learning interatomic potentials

Discrepancies and error evaluation metrics for machine learning interatomic potentials

Machine learning interatomic potential: Bridge the gap between small-scale models and realistic device-scale simulations

Exploring Model Complexity in Machine Learned Potentials for Simulated Properties

Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials and Long-Range Physics

Recent advances in machine learning interatomic potentials for cross-scale computational simulation of materials

Systematic assessment of various universal machine-learning interatomic potentials

A theoretical case study of the generalization of machine-learned potentials

Enhancing the Quality and Reliability of Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials through Better Reporting Practices

A Theoretical Case Study of the Generalisation of Machine-learned Potentials

Learning Together: Towards foundational models for machine learning interatomic potentials with meta-learning

Learning together: Towards foundation models for machine learning interatomic potentials with meta-learning

Conceptual and practical bases for the high accuracy of machine learning interatomic potential

Performance Assessment of Universal Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials: Challenges and Directions for Materials' Surfaces

Construction of High Accuracy Machine Learning Interatomic Potential for Surface/Interface of Nanomaterials—A Review

Improving Molecular Dynamics Simulations for Solid‐Liquid Interface with Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials

Evidential Deep Learning for Interatomic Potentials

Transferability of datasets between Machine-Learning Interaction Potentials

Overcoming systematic softening in universal machine learning interatomic potentials by fine-tuning