iGEM: a model system for team science and innovation

Marc Santolini,Leo Blondel,Megan J. Palmer,Robert N. Ward,Rathin Jeyaram,Kathryn R. Brink,Abhijeet Krishna,Albert-Laszlo Barabasi

2023-10-31

Abstract:Teams are a primary source of innovation in science and technology. Rather than examining the lone genius, scholarly and policy attention has shifted to understanding how team interactions produce new and useful ideas. Yet the organizational roots of innovation remain unclear, in part because of the limitations of current data. This paper introduces the international Genetically Engineered Machine (iGEM) competition, a model system for studying team science and innovation. By combining digital laboratory notebooks with performance data from 2,406 teams over multiple years of participation, we reveal shared dynamical and organizational patterns across teams and identify features associated with team performance and success. This dataset makes visible organizational behavior that is typically hidden, and thus understudied, creating new opportunities for the science of science and innovation.

Social and Information Networks,Physics and Society

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: **How to gain an in - depth understanding of the organizational patterns and success factors of team science and innovation through the data of the International Genetically Engineered Machine (iGEM) competition**. Specifically, the author aims to:

1. **Reveal the organizational roots of team innovation**: The existing data limits our understanding of how teams generate new ideas. Through the data of the iGEM competition, the author hopes to reveal the internal and cross - team dynamics and organizational patterns, so as to better understand how teams collaborate to achieve innovation.

2. **Identify the characteristics that affect team performance and success**: By analyzing the behavioral data of a large number of teams (such as edit history, project documents, etc.), the author attempts to find out which characteristics are closely related to the success and performance of the team, such as team size, member role assignment, task division, etc.

3. **Provide new research opportunities**: The iGEM competition provides detailed, public, and multi - dimensional data sets, which are usually hidden or difficult to obtain in other scientific research environments. Therefore, the author hopes to provide new research opportunities for "science of science" and innovation research through this model system.

### Specific problem decomposition:
- **Research on organizational patterns**: The working methods of iGEM teams are similar to those of teams in professional environments, with a high degree of task dependence and uncertainty. The author hopes to reveal the internal and cross - team interaction patterns through detailed data analysis.

- **Utilization of behavioral data**: The competition rules require teams to record detailed project progress, including static and dynamic behaviors, internal and external interactions, and project descriptions. These data can be used to observe team behaviors and identify the key drivers that affect team performance.

- **Possibility of causal inference**: Since the competition rules have remained stable for many years, the author can use panel data analysis methods for causal inference and explore the impact of specific factors on team performance.

### Main contributions:
- **Uniqueness of data**: The data set of the iGEM competition has high granularity and wide coverage, and can capture the details of internal and cross - team interactions, which are lacking in existing public data sets.

- **Innovation of research methods**: By combining digital laboratory notebooks and performance data, the author shows how to use these data to study the organizational behavior, learning process, and success factors of teams.

In short, through the unique model system of the iGEM competition, this paper aims to fill the gaps in existing research on the organizational patterns of team science and innovation and their success factors.