The Use of AI-Robotic Systems for Scientific Discovery

Alexander H. Gower,Konstantin Korovin,Daniel Brunnsåker,Filip Kronström,Gabriel K. Reder,Ievgeniia A. Tiukova,Ronald S. Reiserer,John P. Wikswo,Ross D. King
2024-06-25
Abstract:The process of developing theories and models and testing them with experiments is fundamental to the scientific method. Automating the entire scientific method then requires not only automation of the induction of theories from data, but also experimentation from design to implementation. This is the idea behind a robot scientist -- a coupled system of AI and laboratory robotics that has agency to test hypotheses with real-world experiments. In this chapter we explore some of the fundamentals of robot scientists in the philosophy of science. We also map the activities of a robot scientist to machine learning paradigms, and argue that the scientific method shares an analogy with active learning. We demonstrate these concepts using examples from previous robot scientists, and also from Genesis: a next generation robot scientist designed for research in systems biology, comprising a micro-fluidic system with 1000 computer-controlled micro-bioreactors and interpretable models based in controlled vocabularies and logic.
Machine Learning,Artificial Intelligence
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper explores the possibilities and importance of using Artificial Intelligence (AI) and robotic systems for scientific research, especially through the construction of "robot scientists" with autonomous experimental capabilities. The paper emphasizes the challenges of automating the entire scientific method, including both inductive theory building from data and the experimental process from design to implementation. The author discusses foundational concepts of robot scientists in the philosophy of science, such as theory, simplicity of models, inference methods, and scientific value assessment. The paper points out that scientific discovery shares similarities with active learning patterns rather than reinforcement learning, making it more suitable for designing and analyzing robot scientists. The paper also introduces applications in the field of systems biology, particularly a next-generation robot scientist called Genesis, which has 1000 computer-controlled microbial reactors and interpretable models based on control vocabularies and logic. Through case studies, the paper demonstrates how Genesis is used for automated scientific discovery. The core concepts include: 1. Simplicity: The simplest theory is preferable when it equally fits the data. 2. Logical reasoning: Facts and theories are represented using propositional logic and first-order logic. 3. Statistical inference: Dealing with uncertainty allows us to form and improve models based on observed data. The paper also discusses the comparison of scientific models and proposes a set of criteria for evaluating theories, including internal consistency, external consistency, empirical accuracy, scope, simplicity, and fertility. It also notes that scientists may have differing relative importance on these criteria. Finally, the paper views scientific discovery as a machine learning problem, specifically supervised learning, as they involve learning functions for prediction from data. At the same time, active learning is proposed as a suitable agent to be integrated into supervised learning, allowing the learning agent to choose the next data point to guide learning, aligning with the scientific method. Despite the potential of large language models and other foundational models in scientific discovery, their black-box nature and possible "illusions" (inaccurate or unsupported outputs) present challenges that require careful use.