Scalable Two-Minute Feedback: Digital, Lecture-Accompanying Survey as a Continuous Feedback Instrument

Armin Egetenmeier,Sven Strickroth
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2024.14.4.2079
2024-04-15
Abstract:Detailed feedback on courses and lecture content is essential for their improvement and also serves as a tool for reflection. However, feedback methods are often only used sporadically, especially in mass courses, because collecting and analyzing feedback in a timely manner is often a challenge for teachers. Moreover, the current situation of the students or the changing workload during the semester are usually not taken into account either. For a holistic investigation, the article used a digital survey format as formative feedback which attempts to measure student stress in a quantitative part and to address the participants' reflection in a qualitative part, as well as to collect general suggestions for improvement (based on the so-called One-Minute Paper) at two educational institutions. The feedback during the semester is evaluated qualitatively and discussed on a meta-level and special features (e.g. reflections on student work ethic or other courses) are addressed. The results show a low, but constant rate of feedback. Responses mostly cover topics of the lecture content or organizational aspects and were intensively used to report issues within the lecture. In addition, artificial intelligence (AI) support in the form of a large language model was tested and showed promising results in summarizing the open-ended responses for the teacher. Finally, the experiences from the lecturers are reflected upon and the results as well as possibilities for improvement are discussed.
Computers and Society
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the challenge of collecting and analyzing student feedback in large - scale courses. Specifically, the author focuses on how to continuously collect student feedback during the semester so that teachers can adjust teaching methods in a timely manner to better meet the needs of students. Traditional feedback methods are often carried out only at the end of the semester and are usually standardized, making it difficult to reflect the current situation of students or the changing workload. In addition, the application of these methods in large - scale courses is also limited because processing a large amount of feedback information requires a great deal of time and energy. To address these challenges, this paper proposes a digital formative feedback tool - the Two - Minute Feedback Survey (2MF Survey). This tool aims to quantitatively measure students' stress levels through a brief survey once a week, promote students' reflection through open - ended questions, and simultaneously collect general improvement suggestions for the course. The researchers conducted experiments in two different educational institutions to evaluate the effectiveness and practicality of this tool. The main research questions include: - How do motivation, workload, and perceived stress affect students' ability to understand the course? How does this effect change throughout the semester? Are there differences between different educational institutions? - What do students' free - text responses to open - ended questions contain? Can these contents form stable theme clusters? Do these clusters change over time? - What is the ability of large - language models (such as ChatGPT) in summarizing student feedback? Through these questions, the researchers hope to explore how to use technological means to improve the efficiency of feedback collection and analysis in large - scale courses, thereby supporting teachers to adjust teaching strategies more effectively.