Confirmation of a Substantial Discrepancy between Radio and UV--IR Measures of the Star Formation Rate Density at 0.2 < z < 1.3

A. M Matthews,D. D. Kelson,A. B. Newman,F. Camilo,J. J. Condon,W. D. Cotton,M. Dickinson,T. H. Jarrett,M. Lacy

2024-04-23

Abstract:We present the initial sample of redshifts for 3,839 galaxies in the MeerKAT DEEP2 field -- the deepest $\sim$1.4\,GHz radio field yet observed. Using a spectrophotometric technique combining coarse optical spectra with broadband photometry, we obtain redshifts with $\sigma_z \leq 0.01(1+z)$. The resulting radio luminosity functions between $0.2<z<1.3$ from our sample of 3,839 individual galaxies are in remarkable agreement with those inferred from modeling radio source counts, confirming an excess in radio-based SFRD$(z$) measurements at late times compared to those from the UV--IR. Several sources of systematic error are discussed -- with most having the potential of exacerbating the discrepancy -- with the conclusion that significant work remains to have confidence in a full accounting of the star formation budget of the universe.

Astrophysics of Galaxies

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper investigates the significant differences between the measurements of the star formation rate density (SFRD) based on radio and ultraviolet to infrared observations in the redshift range of 0.2 < z < 1.3. By observing the MeerKAT DEEP2 field, the authors confirm that the radio-based SFRD measurement is about 50% higher than the ultraviolet-infrared measurement, indicating a discrepancy between long-wavelength and short-wavelength data in understanding the cosmic star formation history. Although systematic errors exist, these errors cannot fully explain this difference, suggesting the need for further work to accurately assess the star formation budget. The study also involves follow-up observations using multi-wavelength data to reduce systematic errors and test evolution models.