Abstract:Physical dimensions are {\it not numbers}, but used as {\it numbers} to perform dimensional analysis by the physicist. The law of excluded middle falls short of explaining the contradictory meanings of the same symbols. The statements like ``$r\to 0$'', ``$q\to 0$'', used by the physicist, are inconsistent on dimensional grounds because ``$r$'', ``$q$'' represent {\it quantities} with physical dimensions of $[L], [Q]$ respectively and ``$0$'' represents just a number devoid of physical dimension. Consequently, the involvement of the statement ``$\lim_{q\to 0}$, where $q$ is the test charge'' in the definition of electric field leads to either circular reasoning or a contradiction regarding the experimental verification of the smallest charge in the Millikan-Fletcher oil drop experiment. Considering such issues as problematic, by choice, I make an inquiry regarding the basic language in terms of which physics is written, with an aim of exploring how truthfully the verbal statements can be converted to the corresponding physico-mathematical expressions (involving physical dimensions). Necessarily I demonstrate the meaning of the terms ``self inquiry'', ``middle way'', ``dependent origination'', ``emptiness/relational existence'', which signify the basic tenets of Buddhism. In light of this, I explain my view of ``definition''; the relation among quantity, physical dimension and number; the logico-linguistic fallacy of ``zero quantity''; difference between unit and unity. I present a critical analysis of the definitions of electric field due to Maxwell and Jackson. A postulate regarding the existence of charges becomes necessary which, however, resolves the contradiction regarding the oil drop experiment. This work is an appeal for the dissociation of the categorical disciplines of logic and physics and on the large, a fruitful merger of Eastern philosophy and Western science.

Unprovability of First Maxwell's Equation in Light of EPR's Completeness Condition -- A Computational Approach from Logico-linguistic Perspective

A Complete Description and Applications for a Photon

Price Variations in a Stock Market With Many Agents

Relativity with or without light and Maxwell

Maxwell's demon and impossibility statements: Einstein on perpetuum mobile of the second kind

Maxwell-Dirac isomorphism revisited: from foundations of quantum mechanics to geometrodynamics and cosmology

On some EPR (Einstein, Podolsky, Rosen) issues

The complex Maxwell stress tensor theorem: The imaginary stress tensor and the reactive strength of orbital momentum. A novel scenery underlying electromagnetic and optical forces

Fundamental formulation of electrodynamics revisited, and the precision of quantum electrodynamics

Equivalence of Maxwell's source-free equations to the time-dependent Schroedinger equation for a solitary particle with two polarizations and Hamiltonian |cp|

Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered incomplete?

The EPR paradox, Bell's inequality, and the question of locality

Equivalence between electromagnetic self-energy and self-mass

From Feynman Proof of Maxwell Equations to Noncommutative Quantum Mechanics

Maxwell's fluid model of magnetism

Cauchy’s Logico-Linguistic Slip, the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle and a Semantic Dilemma Concerning “Quantum Gravity”

A logico-linguistic inquiry into the foundations of physics: Part I

EPR Paradox and Magician's Props

Fantastic quasi-photon and the symmetries of Maxwell electromagnetic theory, momentum-energy conservation law, and Fermat's principle

Cauchy's Logico-Linguistic Slip, the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle and a Semantic Dilemma Concerning "Quantum Gravity"

On the experimental foundations of the Maxwell equations