Abstract:Recent advances in computing power devoted to Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) have opened up a new avenue for addressing the turbulence closure problem through Machine Learning (ML). Several Tensor Basis Neural Network (TBNN) frameworks aimed at enhancing turbulence Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) modeling have recently been proposed in the literature as data-driven constitutive models for systems with known invariance properties. However, persistent ambiguities remain regarding the physical adequacy of applying the General Eddy Viscosity Model (GEVM) within these frameworks. This work aims at investigating this aspect in an a priori stage for better predictions of the Reynolds stress anisotropy tensor, while preserving the Galilean and rotational invariances. In particular, we propose a general framework providing optimal tensor basis models for two types of canonical flows with increasing complexity: Plane Channel Flow (PCF) and Square Duct Flow (SDF). Subsequently, deep neural networks based on these optimal models are trained using state-of-the-art strategies to achieve a balanced and physically sound prediction of the full anisotropy tensor. A priori results obtained by the proposed framework are in very good agreement with the reference Direct Numerical Simulations (DNS) data. Notably, our shallow network with three layers excels in providing accurate predictions of the anisotropy tensor for PCF at unobserved friction Reynolds numbers, both in interpolation and extrapolation scenarios. The learning of the SDF case is more challenging because of its physical nature but also due to a lack of training data at various regimes. We propose a numerical strategy to alleviate this problem based on Transfer Learning (TL). In order to more efficiently generalize to an unseen intermediate Reτ regime, we take advantage of our prior knowledge acquired from a training with a larger and wider dataset. Our results indicate the potential of the developed network model, and demonstrate the feasibility and efficiency of the TL process in terms of training data size and training time. Based on these results, we believe there is a promising future by integrating these neural networks into an adapted in-house RANS solver.

A priori screening of data-enabled turbulence models

Analysis on Numerical Stability and Convergence of RANS Turbulence Models from the Perspective of Coupling Modes

Analysis on Numerical Stability and Convergence of Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes Simulations from the Perspective of Coupling Modes

Obtaining the mean fields with known Reynolds stresses at steady state

Computing Mean Fields with Known Reynolds Stresses at Steady State

An interpretable framework of data-driven turbulence modeling using deep neural networks

Artificial neural network approach for turbulence models: A local framework

Progressive, Extrapolative Machine Learning for Near-Wall Turbulence Modeling

A Data-driven Approach for Turbulence Modeling

Data-driven RANS closures for improving mean field calculation of separated flows

Assessment of Neural Network Augmented Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes Turbulence Model in Extrapolation Modes

Machine learning based uncertainty quantification of turbulence model for airfoils

Revisiting Tensor Basis Neural Network for Reynolds stress modeling: Application to plane channel and square duct flows

Characterization of Model-Based Uncertainties in Incompressible Turbulent Flows by Machine Learning

Incorporating basic calibrations in existing machine-learned turbulence modeling

Machine Learning Based Reynolds Averaged Simulation of Backward-Facing Step Flows at Different Reynolds Numbers

High Reynolds number airfoil turbulence modeling method based on machine learning technique

kεNet: discovering the turbulence model and applying for low Reynolds number turbulent channel flow

Data-driven approach for modeling Reynolds stress tensor with invariance preservation

A highly accurate strategy for data-driven turbulence modeling

Turbulence Modeling for Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Comparison of Different RANS Models for the Backward-Facing Step Flow