Abstract:Similarity serves as a central construct in theoretical accounts of many cognitive processes,such as perception,classification,learning,memory and reasoning. Previous research has suggested that similarity judgment and difference judgment are inverses of one another. The philosopher James Mill said: " distinguishing differences and similarities is the same thing; a similarity being nothing but a slight difference". That is,as similarity increases,difference will decrease to the same extent. For instance,if wolves and dogs have a similarity rating of 4 on a 1- to- 5 scale,they ought to have a difference rating of 2.However,studies have found that similarity and difference judgments are not necessarily logical opposites. These results were mainly found in situations when both features and structural relations,or both thematic and taxonomic relations were considered. At first,in addition to shared features,the relationships among features also influence similarity judgments,and features and relationships may have different roles in similarity and difference judgments. Secondly,thematic relations also have an effect on similarity,and the thematic relationships are more salient for similarity than for difference. In these cases,the similarity judgment and difference judgment are not logical opposites,either.Behavioral studies suggest that the mechanism of this non- inversion can be explained by the contrast model,structural alignment model and the dual process model to some extent. Event related potential( ERP) studies suggest that the effect of pictures and words information on similarity judgment may be different. Furthermore,the similarity could be divided into perceptual similarity and conceptual similarity based on the dual- coding model of the picture- word information,which may be considered complementary as they were viewed in the earlier literatures,rather than mutually exclusive,which reflect the essence of this cognitive process. The dual- processes of similarity judgment can be used to interpret some phenomena in cognitive psychology,such as inductive reasoning. In conclusion,previous results suggest that two complementary processes,namely,perceptual similarity and conceptual similarity,should be differentiated while we explore similarity. Future studies should explore this question from the views of developmental psychology and cognitive neuroscience.

Ordinal Characterization of Similarity Judgments

Is subjective perceptual similarity metacognitive?

Perceptual Similarity: Insights From Crossmodal Correspondences

The Mechanism of Non-inversion in Similarity Judgment and Difference Judgment

The role of perceptual similarities in determining the asymmetric mixed-category advantage.

DreamSim: Learning New Dimensions of Human Visual Similarity using Synthetic Data

Cognitive complexity explains processing asymmetry in judgments of similarity versus difference

A unified framework for perceived magnitude and dicriminability of sensory stimuli

Evaluating Perceptual Distance Models by Fitting Binomial Distributions to Two-Alternative Forced Choice Data

Partially Proportional and Adaptive Similarity Indices

Categorical laterality indices in fMRI: a parallel with classic similarity indices

A subjective distance between stimuli: quantifying the metric structure of representations

The Processing of Perceptual Similarity with Different Features or Spatial Relations As Revealed by P2/P300 Amplitude.

A high-throughput approach for the efficient prediction of perceived similarity of natural objects

Image Similarity Assessment Based on Coefficients of Spatial Association

Towards a perceptual distance metric for auditory stimuli

A Proposal for Linguistic Similarity Datasets Based on Commonality Lists

Discovery of a perceptual distance function for measuring image similarity

A New Measurement of Systematic Similarity

Similarity of Objects and the Meaning of Words

Evaluating Representational Similarity Measures from the Lens of Functional Correspondence