Joint Optimization of seismometer arrays for the cancellation of Newtonian noise from seismic body waves in the Einstein Telescope

Francesca Badaracco,Jan Harms,Luca Rei

2023-10-09

Abstract:Seismic Newtonian noise is predicted to limit the sensitivity of the Einstein Telescope. It can be reduced with coherent noise cancellation techniques using data from seismometers. To achieve the best results, it is important to place the seismic sensors in optimal positions. A preliminary study on this topic was conducted for the Einstein Telescope (ET): it focused on the optimization of the seismic array for the cancellation of Newtonian noise at an isolated test mass. In this paper, we expand the study to include the nested shape of ET, i.e., four test masses of the low-frequency interferometers at each vertex of the detector. Results are investigated in function of the polarization content of the seismic field composed of body waves. The study also examines how performance can be affected by displacing the sensor array from its optimal position or by operating at frequencies other than those used for optimization.

Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: how to effectively eliminate Newtonian noise (NN) caused by seismic body waves in the Einstein Telescope (ET) by optimizing the positions of seismometer arrays. Specifically, the research aims to:

1. **Optimize the seismometer array configuration**: In order to achieve the best Newtonian noise cancellation effect in the low - frequency interferometers of ET, the optimal positions of seismometers need to be determined. Since ET has a triangular layout and four test masses (TMs) are located near each vertex, the correlations between these test masses need to be considered simultaneously.

2. **Consider the polarization characteristics of the seismic field**: The seismic field consists of P - waves (compression waves) and S - waves (shear waves). Different types of waves have different propagation speeds, which will affect the effectiveness of the array. Therefore, the research also explores the influence of the polarization components of the seismic field (i.e., the ratio of P - waves and S - waves) on the noise cancellation performance.

3. **Evaluate the robustness under non - optimal configurations**: In actual deployment, seismometers may not be placed precisely at the theoretically optimal positions, or the working frequencies may be different from the optimized frequencies. Therefore, the research also examines the influence of these factors on the noise cancellation performance.

### Main methods

- **Selection of cost function**: A global cost function is defined, which is based on the residuals of all three low - frequency interferometers to ensure that all relevant test masses are considered simultaneously during the optimization process.

\[
L=\max_{\forall k\in(\text{input}, \text{end1}, \text{end2})}R_{k}(\omega)
\]

- **Application of Wiener filter**: The Wiener filter (WF) is used to estimate and eliminate Newtonian noise. The Wiener filter optimizes the configuration of the seismometer array by minimizing the residual noise.

- **Optimization algorithm**: The Differential Evolution Optimizer, a stochastic optimization algorithm that can handle complex multi - dimensional optimization problems, is adopted for optimization.

### Main findings

- **Influence of polarization components**: When the ratio of P - waves to S - waves is close to 0.1 to 0.4, the noise cancellation performance is the worst. As the number of sensors increases, the influence of polarization components on performance gradually weakens.

- **Influence of position deviation**: Even a small deviation in sensor position (e.g., 30 meters) will significantly reduce the noise cancellation effect, especially in cases where P - waves or S - waves are dominant.

- **Influence of frequency change**: The noise cancellation performance is better at frequencies lower than the optimized frequency, while the performance drops significantly at frequencies higher than the optimized frequency.

### Conclusion

This research shows that under ideal conditions (such as isotropic and stationary seismic fields), using 20 seismometers can reduce the Newtonian noise amplitude by 5 times. However, in actual deployment, the precise positions of seismometers and the characteristics of the seismic field may be different. Therefore, further research on more realistic seismic field models is required to evaluate the actual performance and robustness of the noise cancellation system.