Resolving a Clearing Member's Default, A Radner Equilibrium Approach

Dorinel Bastide,Stéphane Crépey,Samuel Drapeau,Mekonnen Tadese
2024-10-24
Abstract:For vanilla derivatives that constitute the bulk of investment banks' hedging portfolios, central clearing through central counterparties (CCPs) has become hegemonic. A key mandate of a CCP is to provide an efficient and proper clearing member default resolution procedure. When a clearing member defaults, the CCP can hedge and auction or liquidate its positions. The counterparty credit risk cost of auctioning has been analyzed in terms of XVA metrics in Bastide, Cr{é}pey, Drapeau, and Tadese (2023). In this work we assess the costs of hedging or liquidating. This is done by comparing pre- and post-default market equilibria, using a Radner equilibrium approach for portfolio allocation and price discovery in each case. We show that the Radner equilibria uniquely exist and we provide both analytical and numerical solutions for the latter in elliptically distributed markets. Using such tools, a CCP could decide rationally on which market to hedge and auction or liquidate defaulted portfolios.
Risk Management
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper attempts to solve the problem of how a central counterparty (CCP) can effectively handle a defaulting portfolio when a clearing member defaults. Specifically, the research focuses on evaluating the costs associated with hedging or liquidating a defaulting portfolio. By comparing the market equilibria before and after the default and using the Radner equilibrium framework to analyze the changes in portfolio allocation and price discovery, it provides a rational basis for the CCP to decide whether to hedge, auction, or liquidate the defaulting portfolio in a specific market. The following are the core problems and methods of the paper: 1. **Problem Background**: - Central counterparties (CCP) play an important role in financial markets, especially in derivatives trading. - When a clearing member defaults, the CCP needs to quickly handle its portfolio, including hedging and auctioning these assets. - Previous research has mainly focused on credit risk in the auction process, while this paper focuses on the costs of hedging or liquidating. 2. **Research Objectives**: - Evaluate the costs associated with hedging or liquidating a defaulting portfolio. - Use the Radner equilibrium framework to compare the market equilibrium states before and after the default. - Provide specific mathematical models and solutions to help the CCP make optimal decisions. 3. **Methodology**: - Use the Radner equilibrium framework to analyze the optimal strategies of market participants before and after the default. - Establish a mathematical model to prove the existence and uniqueness of the Radner equilibrium. - Derive explicit analytical and numerical solutions in a market environment with an elliptical distribution. - Compare the market impacts in different scenarios, such as when the CCP clears on an internal or external exchange, or hedges the defaulting assets through proprietary trading. 4. **Application Scenarios**: - Provide decision - support for the CCP to help it determine whether to choose hedging, auctioning, or liquidating a defaulting portfolio under specific market conditions. - Clearing members can use these research results for "what - if analysis" to respond to inquiries from senior management and regulatory agencies. In summary, this paper aims to provide a scientific basis for the CCP in handling clearing member defaults through rigorous mathematical modeling and market analysis, ensuring the stability and efficiency of the financial market.