Spot-Based Measurement of the Brighter-Fatter Effect on a Roman Space Telescope H4RG Detector and Comparison with Flat-Field Data

Andrés A. Plazas Malagón,Charles Shapiro,Ami Choi,Chris Hirata

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/19/03/P03015

2024-02-08

Abstract:We present the measurement and characterization of the brighter-fatter effect (BFE) on a NASA Roman Space Telescope development Teledyne H4RG-10 near-infrared detector using laboratory measurements with projected point sources. After correcting for other interpixel non-linearity effects such as classical non-linearity and inter-pixel capacitance, we quantify the magnitude of the BFE by calculating the fractional area change per electron of charge contrast. We also introduce a mathematical framework to compare our results with the BFE measured on similar devices using autocorrelations from flat-field images. We find an agreement of 18 +/- 5% between the two methods. We identify potential sources of discrepancy and discuss future investigations to characterize and address them.

Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### What problem does this paper attempt to solve?

This paper aims to study and characterize the "Brighter - Fatter Effect" (BFE) on the Teledyne H4RG - 10 near - infrared detector of the NASA Roman Space Telescope. Specifically, the authors use the projected point - source data measured in the laboratory to quantify the BFE and compare their results with the BFE measured through flat - field images.

#### Main problems include:

1. **Quantifying BFE**:
- Researchers hope to quantify the change in pixel area caused by each electron - charge contrast on the H4RG - 10 detector. This involves calculating the fraction of area change per unit charge contrast \(\frac{dA}{A}\).
- Using the formula:
\[
\frac{dQ}{dt}=F(t)=F_0(1 + BQ_c(t))=F_1(1 + BF_ct)
\]
where \(F_1\) is the unaltered flux in the reference frame, \(Q_c\) and \(F_c\) are the average charge and flux contrast between the central pixel and its four nearest - neighbor pixels respectively, and the coefficient \(B\) represents the proportion of area change per electron contrast.

2. **Verifying the consistency of different methods**:
- Compare the measurement results based on point - sources with the results measured through flat - field images. The researchers introduced a mathematical framework to compare the results of these two methods.
- The comparison results show an 18±5% consistency between the two methods.

3. **Understanding and reducing systematic errors**:
- Researchers explored potential sources that may cause differences, such as the deviation of the Antilogus boundary - offset model, other forms of nonlinear crosstalk (for example, the vertical trailing - pixel effect in the read - out integrated circuit), the BFE variation between chips, the influence of operating conditions, wavelength dependence, and the contribution of image motion in the point - source projector, etc.

4. **Application in weak - gravitational - lensing measurements**:
- BFE mainly affects weak - gravitational - lensing measurements (galaxy - shape measurements and shear inferences) because it changes the size and ellipticity of the point - spread function (PSF). An accurate PSF model is crucial for effectively deconvolving the images of faint galaxies to infer shear.
- The current state - of - the - art BFE correction algorithms (such as the algorithm proposed by Antilogus et al. [2]) have been applied in ground - based CCD camera experiments, such as the Dark Energy Survey (DES) and the Hyper Suprime - Cam Survey (HSC), and are planned to be used in future Stage IV surveys, such as LSST and Roman's high - latitude wide - field survey.

### Summary

The main purpose of this paper is to ensure the accuracy of the Roman Space Telescope in weak - gravitational - lensing science through precise measurement and characterization of the BFE on the H4RG - 10 detector. The research also explored the consistency between different measurement methods and pointed out the directions for further research in the future to reduce systematic errors and improve the BFE correction method.