How crowd accidents are reported in the news media: Lexical and sentiment analysis

Claudio Feliciani,Alessandro Corbetta,Milad Haghani,Katsuhiro Nishinari

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106423

2023-12-26

Abstract:The portrayal of crowd accidents by the media can influence public understanding and emotional response, shaping societal perceptions and potentially impacting safety measures and preparedness strategies. This paper critically examines the portrayal of crowd accidents in news coverage by analyzing the texts of 372 media reports of crowd accidents spanning 26 diverse news sources from 1900 to 2019. We investigate how media representations of crowd accidents vary across time and geographical origins. Our methodology combines lexical analysis to unveil prevailing terminologies and sentiment analysis to discern the emotional tenor of the reports. The findings reveal the prevalence of the term "stampede" over "panic" in media descriptions of crowd accidents. Notably, divergent patterns are observable when comparing Western versus South Asian media (notably India and Pakistan), unveiling a cross-cultural dimension. Moreover, the analysis detects a gradual transition from "crowd stampede" to "crowd crush" in media and Wikipedia narratives in recent years, suggesting evolving lexical sensitivities. Sentiment analysis uncovers a consistent association with fear-related language, indicative of media's propensity towards sensationalism. This fear-infused narrative has intensified over time. The study underscores the potential impact of language and sentiment in shaping public perspectives on crowd accidents, revealing a pressing need for responsible and balanced reporting that moves beyond sensationalism and promotes a nuanced understanding. This will be crucial for increasing public awareness and preparedness against such accidents.

Physics and Society

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper attempts to address the issues present in media coverage of crowd incidents, particularly how these reports influence public understanding, emotional responses, and social cognition, as well as the potential impact on safety measures and response strategies. Specifically, the researchers analyzed 372 reports on crowd incidents from 26 different news sources (spanning from 1900 to 2019) to explore the following aspects:

1. **Trends in Media Coverage**: The researchers analyzed changes in media reporting styles across different periods and geographic regions to understand if there are specific temporal or regional characteristics.

2. **Vocabulary Usage**: Through lexical analysis, the researchers revealed changes in commonly used terms in media reports, such as the frequency and trend of terms like "stampede" and "panic." The study found that the term "stampede" is more commonly used in media descriptions than "panic," with significant differences between Western media and South Asian media (e.g., India and Pakistan).

3. **Emotional Tendencies**: Through sentiment analysis, the researchers discovered a prevalent use of fear-related emotional language in the reports, indicating that the media tends to use sensational language when reporting on crowd incidents. This emotional tendency has intensified over time.

4. **Cross-Cultural Differences**: The study also explored differences in media coverage across different cultural backgrounds, such as the differing vocabulary and emotional expressions used by Western media and South Asian media when describing crowd incidents.

5. **Impact of Language and Emotion on Public Cognition**: The research emphasized the potential impact of language and emotion in shaping public cognition of crowd incidents, highlighting the need for responsible and balanced reporting to promote accurate public understanding of crowd incidents and enhance public safety awareness and response capabilities.

In summary, the paper aims to reveal the issues in media coverage of crowd incidents through systematic text analysis methods and proposes suggestions for improving reporting practices to reduce misunderstandings and enhance public safety awareness.