Artificial Intelligence and Aesthetic Judgment

Jessica Hullman,Ari Holtzman,Andrew Gelman
2023-08-22
Abstract:Generative AIs produce creative outputs in the style of human expression. We argue that encounters with the outputs of modern generative AI models are mediated by the same kinds of aesthetic judgments that organize our interactions with artwork. The interpretation procedure we use on art we find in museums is not an innate human faculty, but one developed over history by disciplines such as art history and art criticism to fulfill certain social functions. This gives us pause when considering our reactions to generative AI, how we should approach this new medium, and why generative AI seems to incite so much fear about the future. We naturally inherit a conundrum of causal inference from the history of art: a work can be read as a symptom of the cultural conditions that influenced its creation while simultaneously being framed as a timeless, seemingly acausal distillation of an eternal human condition. In this essay, we focus on an unresolved tension when we bring this dilemma to bear in the context of generative AI: are we looking for proof that generated media reflects something about the conditions that created it or some eternal human essence? Are current modes of interpretation sufficient for this task? Historically, new forms of art have changed how art is interpreted, with such influence used as evidence that a work of art has touched some essential human truth. As generative AI influences contemporary aesthetic judgment we outline some of the pitfalls and traps in attempting to scrutinize what AI generated media means.
Computers and Society,Artificial Intelligence
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper attempts to explore the issue of aesthetic judgment raised by generative artificial intelligence (AI) when creating artistic works. Specifically, the authors believe that the interaction with the output of modern generative AI models is mediated in a way similar to our aesthetic judgment of artworks. These judgments are not an inherent human ability but have been developed historically by disciplines such as art history and art criticism to fulfill certain social functions. Therefore, when considering our reactions to generative AI, how we should approach this new medium, and why generative AI seems to arouse so much fear for the future, we need to pause and think. The paper further explores the unresolved tensions when applying this dilemma to generative AI: are we looking for evidence that the generated media reflects its conditions of creation, or some eternal human essence? Are the current interpretive models sufficient for this task? Historically, new art forms have changed the way art is interpreted, and this influence has been used as evidence that an artwork touches on some fundamental human truths. With the impact of generative AI on contemporary aesthetic judgment, the authors outline some of the pitfalls and misunderstandings that may be encountered when attempting to examine the meaning of AI - generated media. In conclusion, this paper aims to explore how and why people have specific reactions when facing AI - generated content by comparing the aesthetic judgment of generative AI and traditional art, and proposes the need for critical reflection on these reactions.