Towards LLM-based Autograding for Short Textual Answers

Johannes Schneider,Bernd Schenk,Christina Niklaus
2024-07-08
Abstract:Grading exams is an important, labor-intensive, subjective, repetitive, and frequently challenging task. The feasibility of autograding textual responses has greatly increased thanks to the availability of large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT and the substantial influx of data brought about by digitalization. However, entrusting AI models with decision-making roles raises ethical considerations, mainly stemming from potential biases and issues related to generating false information. Thus, in this manuscript, we provide an evaluation of a large language model for the purpose of autograding, while also highlighting how LLMs can support educators in validating their grading procedures. Our evaluation is targeted towards automatic short textual answers grading (ASAG), spanning various languages and examinations from two distinct courses. Our findings suggest that while "out-of-the-box" LLMs provide a valuable tool to provide a complementary perspective, their readiness for independent automated grading remains a work in progress, necessitating human oversight.
Computation and Language,Artificial Intelligence
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper attempts to address the labor-intensive, subjective, repetitive, and challenging issues present in the exam grading process. With the advent of large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT and the abundance of data brought by digitalization, the feasibility of automatically grading textual answers has greatly increased. However, using AI models in decision-making roles raises ethical considerations, primarily due to potential biases and the generation of incorrect information. Therefore, this paper aims to evaluate the application of large language models in automatic grading, while also exploring how LLMs can support educators in validating their grading procedures. Specifically, the research focuses on automatic short answer grading (ASAG), covering exams in different languages and two different subjects. The study finds that while "out-of-the-box" LLMs can provide a valuable supplementary perspective, their capability for independent automated grading is still developing and requires human supervision.