Abstract:There is a significant gap in Computing Education Research (CER) concerning the impact of Large Language Models (LLMs) in advanced stages of degree programmes. This study aims to address this gap by investigating the effectiveness of LLMs in answering exam questions within an applied machine learning final-year undergraduate course. The research examines the performance of LLMs in responding to a range of exam questions, including proctored closed-book and open-book questions spanning various levels of Bloom’s Taxonomy. Question formats encompassed open-ended, tabular data-based, and figure-based inquiries. To achieve this aim, the study has the following objectives: Comparative Analysis: To compare LLM-generated exam answers with actual student submissions to assess LLM performance. Detector Evaluation: To evaluate the efficacy of LLM detectors by directly inputting LLM-generated responses into these detectors. Additionally, assess detector performance on tampered LLM outputs designed to conceal their AI-generated origin. The research methodology used for this paper incorporates a staff-student partnership model involving eight academic staff and six students. Students play integral roles in shaping the project’s direction, particularly in areas unfamiliar to academic staff, such as specific tools to avoid LLM detection. This study contributes to the understanding of LLMs' role in advanced education settings, with implications for future curriculum design and assessment methodologies. Existe un importante vacío en la Investigación de Educación en Computación (CER) sobre el impacto de Modelos de Lenguaje de Gran Escala (LLM) en etapas avanzadas de estudios de grado. Este artículo trata de cubrir este vacío investigando la efectividad de las LLM respondiendo preguntas de examen de Aprendizaje Automático Aplicado en último curso de Grado. El estudio examina el desempeño de las LLM al responder a una variedad de preguntas de examen, que incluyen modelos de examen diseñados con y sin apuntes, a varios niveles de la Taxonomía de Bloom. Los formatos de pregunta incluyen de respuesta abierta, basadas en tablas, o en figuras. Para conseguir esta meta, este estudio tiene los siguientes objetivos: Análisis Comparativo: Comparar respuestas generadas por LLM y por estudiantes para juzgar el desempeño de las LLM. Evaluación de Detectores: Evaluar la eficacia de diferentes detectores de LLM. Además, juzgar la eficacia de los detectores sobre texto alterado por alumnos con el objetivo de engañar a los detectores. El método investigador de este artículo incorpora una relación entre seis alumnos y ocho profesores. Los estudiantes juegan un rol integral para determinar la dirección del proyecto, en especial en áreas poco conocidas para el profesorado, como el uso de herramientas de detección de LLM. Este estudio contribuye a entender el rol de las LLM en el ámbito de la educación universitaria, con implicaciones para el diseño de futuros curriculums y técnicas de evaluación. NA

Evaluating Students' Open-ended Written Responses with LLMs: Using the RAG Framework for GPT-3.5, GPT-4, Claude-3, and Mistral-Large

Open Source Language Models Can Provide Feedback: Evaluating LLMs' Ability to Help Students Using GPT-4-As-A-Judge

Large Language Model as an Assignment Evaluator: Insights, Feedback, and Challenges in a 1000+ Student Course

Can LLMs Grade Short-Answer Reading Comprehension Questions : An Empirical Study with a Novel Dataset

Can Large Language Models Make the Grade? An Empirical Study Evaluating LLMs Ability to Mark Short Answer Questions in K-12 Education

Using Large Language Models for Automated Grading of Student Writing about Science

Large Language Models in Student Assessment: Comparing ChatGPT and Human Graders

Automated Feedback in Math Education: A Comparative Analysis of LLMs for Open-Ended Responses

A Large Language Model Approach to Educational Survey Feedback Analysis

LLM4DS: Evaluating Large Language Models for Data Science Code Generation

Assessing Hidden Risks of LLMs: An Empirical Study on Robustness, Consistency, and Credibility

Evaluating the Impact of Advanced LLM Techniques on AI-Lecture Tutors for a Robotics Course

Evaluating Language Models for Generating and Judging Programming Feedback

Evaluating Quality of Answers for Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Strong LLM Is All You Need

Exploring the Responses of Large Language Models to Beginner Programmers' Help Requests

Machine Vs Machine: Large Language Models (llms) in Applied Machine Learning High-Stakes Open-Book Exams

LLMEval: A Preliminary Study on How to Evaluate Large Language Models

Open-LLM-Leaderboard: From Multi-choice to Open-style Questions for LLMs Evaluation, Benchmark, and Arena

Improving accuracy of GPT-3/4 results on biomedical data using a retrieval-augmented language model

Investigating the Efficacy of Large Language Models in Reflective Assessment Methods through Chain of Thoughts Prompting

"Which LLM should I use?": Evaluating LLMs for tasks performed by Undergraduate Computer Science Students