William R. Tavares,Sidney S. Avancini,Ricardo L. S. Farias,Rafael P. Cardoso
Abstract:Recently, first-order phase transitions have been predicted as an effect of the inclusion of quark anomalous magnetic moment (AMM) in the hot and magnetized Nambu--Jona-Lasinio model (NJL). These transitions appear in the chiral condensate for different combinations of AMM and magnetic fields and could lead to inverse magnetic catalysis. However, in this work, we show that the predicted first-order phase transitions are related to regularization-dependent issues. To show this, we explore, in the context of the vacuum magnetic regularization (VMR) scheme, two different scenarios: when mass-dependent (MD) and mass-independent (MI) terms are present in the subtraction of the divergences. In the MD case, as we increase the AMM value, it is observed the appearance of a nonmassive minimum in the thermodynamical potential, which induces a first-order phase transition from the massive minimum. We argue that the MD terms must be avoided in order to satisfy the predictions of Lattice QCD, and we propose a MI solution that is valid in the limit which the magnetic fields are smaller than the squared of vacuum effective quark mass.
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology,High Energy Physics - Lattice,High Energy Physics - Theory,Nuclear Theory
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is whether the predicted first - order phase transitions are related to the regularization method in the magnetized Nambu - Jona - Lasinio (NJL) model, in the case of including quark anomalous magnetic moments (AMM). Specifically, the author explores whether these first - order phase transitions are caused by mass - dependent (MD) terms and proposes a mass - independent (MI) regularization scheme to eliminate these unphysical effects.
### Background
In the non - perturbative region of quantum chromodynamics (QCD), the dynamic chiral symmetry breaking of quarks leads to quarks having anomalous magnetic moments (AMM). The NJL model is widely used to describe the QCD phase diagram because of its simplicity, especially in the case of including an external magnetic field. However, an inappropriate regularization method may lead to strong unphysical behaviors of quark condensates and thermodynamic properties.
### Core of the problem
- **Predicted first - order phase transitions**: Some studies show that under a strong magnetic field or a large value of quark AMM, the chiral condensate may have a first - order phase transition. This phase transition is accompanied by strong oscillations, which are characteristics of non - magnetic - field - independent regularization methods (non - MFIR).
- **Unphysical effects**: Are these phase transitions caused by the mass - dependent terms introduced during the regularization process? If so, how can these unphysical effects be avoided?
### Research method
The author uses the vacuum magnetic regularization (VMR) method to study the thermodynamic potential in the NJL model. By analyzing mass - dependent and mass - independent terms, they attempt to determine the influence of these terms on the phase - diagram structure.
### Main findings
1. **Mass - dependent terms**: In the Taylor expansion of the thermodynamic potential, mass - dependent terms proportional to \( O(eB^2) \) are identified. These terms will cause an imbalance in the thermodynamic potential at \( M = 0 \), thus inducing possible first - order phase transitions.
2. **Mass - independent regularization**: To eliminate these unphysical effects, the author proposes to apply the Schwinger ansatz in the limit of \( |q_f eB| / M_0^2 \to 0 \). In this case, the additional mass - dependent terms are eliminated and the structure of the thermodynamic potential is more reasonable.
### Conclusion
The author eliminates the first - order phase transitions caused by mass - dependent terms through the mass - independent regularization scheme, making the results of the model consistent with the predictions of lattice QCD. This indicates that the previously predicted first - order phase transitions were mainly due to unphysical effects in the regularization method.
### Formulas
- **Thermodynamic potential**:
\[
\Omega=\frac{(M - m)^2}{4G}+\Omega_{\text{mag}}(M, B)
\]
where
\[
\Omega_{\text{mag}}(M, B)=-N_c\sum_{f = u,d}|B_f|\sum_{n = 0}^{\infty}\sum_{s=\pm1}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\frac{dp_3}{4\pi^2}E_{n,s}^f
\]
\[
E_{n,s}^f=\sqrt{p_3^2+(M_{n,s}^f - s a_f B)^2}
\]
\[
M_{n,s}^f=\sqrt{|B_f|(2n + 1 - s f_s)+M^2}
\]
- **Mass - dependent terms**:
\[
R_f(B_f, M)=\frac{|B_f|^2}{3}-\frac{(a_f B)^4}{6}+2(a_f B)^2M^2+s_f2|B_f|(a_f B)M
\]
- **Mass - independent regularization**:
\[
F_f(\tau)=e^{-\tau(a_f B)^2\tau|B_f|}[s_f\sinh(\tau2a_f B M)+\cosh(\tau2a_f B M)]