Abstract:Team incentives are important in many compensation systems that pay workers according to the output of their team as well as to their own output, with team bonuses often depending on whether the team meets or exceeds specified thresholds. Yet little is known about how team members with different abilities respond to compensation rules and thresholds. We contrast the performance of lower ability participants and higher ability participants in an experiment with three distribution schemes – equal sharing, piece rate sharing, and tournament style winner-takes-all – in settings with and without a team threshold. Workers randomly assigned to equal sharing had higher productivity than those assigned to winner-takes-all and had similar productivity to workers in piece-rate scheme. Output under equal sharing was boosted by the higher productivity of less able workers, possibly motivated by a desire to avoid guilt feelings about letting down their partners, per models of guilt aversion. Given a choice of distribution schemes, participants selected piece rate over equal sharing and favored both of these over winner-takes-all; in addition, a team threshold induced more concern about cooperation and thus greater preference for equal sharing. The findings suggest that organizations with teams of workers with varying abilities are likely to do better if the organization can consider lower ability workers’ responsiveness to sharing in rewards, e.g., to have an equal sharing component in its compensation system when they are strongly guilt averse.Institutional subscribers to the NBER working paper series, and residents of developing countries may download this paper without additional charge at www.nber.org.

Equity Pay In Networked Teams

Neural Payoff Machines: Predicting Fair and Stable Payoff Allocations Among Team Members

Fair Allocation in Crowd-Sourced Systems

Inequity-averse Agents' Deserved Concerns under the Linear Contract: a Social Network Setting.

Equity-based incentive to coordinate shareholder-manager interests under information asymmetry

Sharing a Reward Based on Peer Evaluations

Evolution of collective fairness in complex networks through degree-based role assignment

Rightful Rewards: Refining Equity in Team Resource Allocation through a Data-Driven Optimization Approach

Game Theoretic Analysis of Production-Management Effort Distribution in Organizational Networks

Equity Contracts and Incentive Design in Start-Up Teams

Competition for talent: heterogenous abilities in team production

Incentive Design with Spillovers

Assign and Appraise: Achieving Optimal Performance in Collaborative Teams

Team Incentives and Lower Ability Workers: an Experimental Study on Real-Effort Tasks

A Network Approach to Public Goods: A Short Summary

Coordinating the Crowd: Inducing Desirable Equilibria in Non-Cooperative Systems

Profit equitably: An investigation of market maker's impact on equitable outcomes

Optimizing Contracts in Principal-Agent Team Production

Team Signaling and Collective Reputation with an Application to the Optimal Sharing Rule

Incentivising cooperation by rewarding the weakest member

Optimal incentive contracts under relative income concerns