Abstract:In the echo state networks, both reservoir states and network structure are essential for the performance of reservoir computing. In neuroscience, it has been confirmed that a single neuron can adaptively change its intrinsic excitability to fit various synaptic inputs. This mechanism is called intrinsic plasticity (IP) mechanism in the literature. This adaptive adjustment of neuronal response to external inputs is believed to maximize input-output mutual information. Meanwhile, the existence of multi-clustered structure with small-world-like property in the brain has been strongly supported by many neurophysiological experiments. Thus, it is advisable to consider both the intrinsic plasticity and multi-clustered structure of a reservoir network, rather than a random network with a non-adaptive reservoir response. In this paper, reservoir models with neuronal intrinsic plasticity and multi-clustered structure are investigated. The effects of two types of IP rules on the performance of several computational tasks have been investigated in detail by combining neuronal IP with multi-clustered reservoir structures. The first type is the Triesch’s IP rule, which drives the output activities of neurons to approximate exponential distributions; another is the Li’s IP rule, which generates a Gaussian distribution of neuronal firing. Results show that both the multi-clustered structures and IP rules can improve the computational accuracy of reservoir computing. However, before the application of the IP rules, the enhancement of computational performance for multi-clustered reservoirs is minor. Both IP rules contribute to improvement of the computational performance, where the Li’s IP rule is more advantageous than the Triesch’s IP. The results indicate that the combination of multi-clustered reservoir structures and IP learning can increase the dynamic diversity of reservoir states, especially for the IP’s learning. The adaptive tuning of reservoir states based on IP improves the dynamic complexity of neuronal activity, which helps train output weights. This biologically inspired reservoir model may give insights for the optimization of reservoir computing.

Excitatory/Inhibitory Balance Emerges as a Key Factor for RBN Performance, Overriding Attractor Dynamics

The connectivity degree controls the difficulty of RBN reservoir design

The connectivity degree controls the difficulty in reservoir design of random boolean networks

Reservoir Computing with Both Neuronal Intrinsic Plasticity and Multi-Clustered Structure

Nonlinear Neural Dynamics and Classification Accuracy in Reservoir Computing

Memory Dynamics in Attractor Networks with Saliency Weights.

A balanced memory network

Balanced Excitation and Inhibition are Required for High-Capacity, Noise-Robust Neuronal Selectivity

Ergodicity, lack thereof, and the performance of reservoir computing with memristive networks

Memristive Reservoirs Learn to Learn

Seeing double with a multifunctional reservoir computer

Criticality in reservoir computer of coupled phase oscillators

Critical excitation-inhibition balance in dense neural networks

Revealing and reshaping attractor dynamics in large networks of cortical neurons

Evolving reservoir computers reveals bidirectional coupling between predictive power and emergent dynamics

A robust balancing mechanism for spiking neural networks

Fundamental performance bounds on time-series generation using reservoir computing

Self-organizing Reservoir Computing Based on Spiking-Timing Dependent Plasticity and Intrinsic Plasticity Mechanisms

Investigating Biologically Plausible Neural Networks for Reservoir Computing Solutions

Unveiling the role of plasticity rules in reservoir computing

Biologically-Informed Excitatory and Inhibitory Balance for Robust Spiking Neural Network Training