Abstract:In the echo state networks, both reservoir states and network structure are essential for the performance of reservoir computing. In neuroscience, it has been confirmed that a single neuron can adaptively change its intrinsic excitability to fit various synaptic inputs. This mechanism is called intrinsic plasticity (IP) mechanism in the literature. This adaptive adjustment of neuronal response to external inputs is believed to maximize input-output mutual information. Meanwhile, the existence of multi-clustered structure with small-world-like property in the brain has been strongly supported by many neurophysiological experiments. Thus, it is advisable to consider both the intrinsic plasticity and multi-clustered structure of a reservoir network, rather than a random network with a non-adaptive reservoir response. In this paper, reservoir models with neuronal intrinsic plasticity and multi-clustered structure are investigated. The effects of two types of IP rules on the performance of several computational tasks have been investigated in detail by combining neuronal IP with multi-clustered reservoir structures. The first type is the Triesch’s IP rule, which drives the output activities of neurons to approximate exponential distributions; another is the Li’s IP rule, which generates a Gaussian distribution of neuronal firing. Results show that both the multi-clustered structures and IP rules can improve the computational accuracy of reservoir computing. However, before the application of the IP rules, the enhancement of computational performance for multi-clustered reservoirs is minor. Both IP rules contribute to improvement of the computational performance, where the Li’s IP rule is more advantageous than the Triesch’s IP. The results indicate that the combination of multi-clustered reservoir structures and IP learning can increase the dynamic diversity of reservoir states, especially for the IP’s learning. The adaptive tuning of reservoir states based on IP improves the dynamic complexity of neuronal activity, which helps train output weights. This biologically inspired reservoir model may give insights for the optimization of reservoir computing.

Unveiling the role of plasticity rules in reservoir computing

Reservoir Computing with Both Neuronal Intrinsic Plasticity and Multi-Clustered Structure

Self-organizing Reservoir Computing Based on Spiking-Timing Dependent Plasticity and Intrinsic Plasticity Mechanisms

A Survey on Reservoir Computing and its Interdisciplinary Applications Beyond Traditional Machine Learning

Modeling Neural Plasticity in Echo State Networks for Classification and Regression

Using local plasticity rules to train recurrent neural networks

Balancing complexity, performance and plausibility to meta learn plasticity rules in recurrent spiking networks.

Evolving interpretable plasticity for spiking networks

Understanding plasticity in neural networks

Evolving reservoir computers reveals bidirectional coupling between predictive power and emergent dynamics

Deep Reinforcement Learning with Plasticity Injection

On the Correlation Between Reservoir Metrics and Performance for Time Series Classification under the Influence of Synaptic Plasticity.

Hebbian and Gradient-based Plasticity Enables Robust Memory and Rapid Learning in RNNs

Optical next generation reservoir computing

Design Strategies and Applications of Reservoir Computing: Recent Trends and Prospects

Reservoir Computing Generalized

Decoding Neuronal Networks: A Reservoir Computing Approach for Predicting Connectivity and Functionality

Learning reservoir dynamics with temporal self-modulation

An Online Structural Plasticity Rule for Generating Better Reservoirs

A Developmental Approach to Structural Self-Organization in Reservoir Computing

Reservoir Computing Decoupling Memory-Nonlinearity Trade-Off.