Abstract:Plasticity, the ability of a neural network to quickly change its predictions in response to new information, is essential for the adaptability and robustness of deep reinforcement learning systems. Deep neural networks are known to lose plasticity over the course of training even in relatively simple learning problems, but the mechanisms driving this phenomenon are still poorly understood. This paper conducts a systematic empirical analysis into plasticity loss, with the goal of understanding the phenomenon mechanistically in order to guide the future development of targeted solutions. We find that loss of plasticity is deeply connected to changes in the curvature of the loss landscape, but that it often occurs in the absence of saturated units. Based on this insight, we identify a number of parameterization and optimization design choices which enable networks to better preserve plasticity over the course of training. We validate the utility of these findings on larger-scale RL benchmarks in the Arcade Learning Environment.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper attempts to address the issue of neural networks losing plasticity during training. Specifically, it focuses on the problem of neural networks struggling to adapt to new tasks or new information after training under non-stationary objectives. This phenomenon is particularly pronounced in deep reinforcement learning (RL), as RL agents need to continuously adapt to changing environments. The goal of the paper is to understand the mechanisms leading to the loss of plasticity through systematic empirical analysis, thereby guiding the development of targeted solutions in the future. ### Main Issues 1. **Causes of Plasticity Loss**: The paper explores the reasons why neural networks lose plasticity during training, particularly the relationship between this loss and changes in the curvature of the loss landscape. 2. **Optimization and Parameterization Design**: The paper investigates which parameterization and optimization design choices can better maintain the network's plasticity. 3. **Experimental Validation**: The paper further confirms the practical value of these methods by validating the effectiveness of these findings on large-scale RL benchmarks such as the Arcade Learning Environment. ### Research Background - **Definition of Plasticity**: Plasticity refers to the ability of a neural network to quickly update its predictions when faced with new learning signals. - **Existing Issues**: Existing research indicates that neural networks gradually lose this ability during training, especially when dealing with non-stationary tasks. - **Related Work**: The paper reviews previous work on mitigating plasticity loss, including methods such as resetting layers, activation units, and regularization features. ### Methodology - **Experimental Setup**: The paper conducts a series of experiments to isolate different causal pathways leading to plasticity loss and evaluates the predictive power of various hypotheses regarding the root causes of plasticity loss. - **Measuring Plasticity**: The paper proposes a method to measure plasticity by evaluating the performance of optimization algorithms on a set of randomly generated objective functions. - **Environment Construction**: The paper constructs multiple environments, including simple MDP (Markov Decision Process) variants, to meet different experimental needs. ### Experimental Results - **Optimizer Instability**: The paper demonstrates the instability of adaptive optimizers in non-stationary tasks and how adjusting hyperparameters can mitigate this issue. - **Loss Landscape Evolution**: The paper analyzes the impact of gradient descent optimization on the loss landscape under non-stationary conditions, finding that gradient descent causes the loss landscape to become steeper, thereby affecting plasticity. - **Hypothesis Validation**: The paper experimentally validates various hypotheses that could explain plasticity loss, finding that these hypotheses show different correlations under different circumstances and cannot be considered reliable indicators of causal relationships. ### Conclusion Through systematic empirical analysis, the paper reveals a deep connection between plasticity loss and changes in the curvature of the loss landscape. It proposes several design choices that can better maintain the network's plasticity during training. These findings provide important guidance for the future development of more robust and flexible deep RL methods.

Understanding plasticity in neural networks

Disentangling the Causes of Plasticity Loss in Neural Networks

Plasticity Loss in Deep Reinforcement Learning: A Survey

Deep Reinforcement Learning with Plasticity Injection

A Study of Plasticity Loss in On-Policy Deep Reinforcement Learning

Neural Network Plasticity and Loss Sharpness

Neuroplastic Expansion in Deep Reinforcement Learning

Revisiting Plasticity in Visual Reinforcement Learning: Data, Modules and Training Stages

Loss of plasticity in deep continual learning

A study on the plasticity of neural networks

Differentiable plasticity: training plastic neural networks with backpropagation

Can We Understand Plasticity Through Neural Collapse?

Loss of Plasticity in Continual Deep Reinforcement Learning

Learning the Plasticity: Plasticity-Driven Learning Framework in Spiking Neural Networks

Maintaining Plasticity in Deep Continual Learning

Slow and Steady Wins the Race: Maintaining Plasticity with Hare and Tortoise Networks

Keep Moving: identifying task-relevant subspaces to maximise plasticity for newly learned tasks

Evolving interpretable plasticity for spiking networks

Self-Normalized Resets for Plasticity in Continual Learning

Maintaining Plasticity via Regenerative Regularization

Hebbian and Gradient-based Plasticity Enables Robust Memory and Rapid Learning in RNNs