Abstract:This paper studies the operations and financial decisions of two capital‐constrained firms via a limited joint liability (LJL) financing scheme offered by a bank with a menu of loan terms including interest rate and leverage ratio/credit line. To explicitly assess the value of LJL financing, we assume that the firms either use LJL financing scheme or traditional individual financing scheme to finance their operations. Under LJL financing scheme, we construct a non‐cooperative game model in which the two firms separately determine their own inventory decision to serve random demand, according to the prior joint liability agreement between the two firms and the bank. We prove that the non‐cooperative game between the two firms under the LJL financing scheme is a supermodular, and thus establish the existence of equilibrium inventory decisions of the firms. We then characterize the optimal loan terms of the profit‐seeking bank under the proposed two financing schemes. Our results show that the joint‐liability mechanism of the LJL financing scheme always induces the firms to over‐invest in their ordering decisions (relative to the case of the individual financing scheme), which reveals that the endogenous financial terms of the LJL financing scheme have a positive effect on the firms' operational decisions. Importantly, we provide conditions under which the loan terms of the proposed two financing schemes can be properly set by the bank to make the LJL financing scheme more beneficial to the bank and the two firms, and the bank offering this financing scheme can obtain two additional benefits–i.e., a higher probability of recouping all the loans and a lower profit risk (i.e., the standard derivation of the bank's random total profit), compared to individual financing scheme. The research findings provide managerial insights for a profit‐seeking bank on how to offer financial loans to capital‐constrained firms and for those capital‐constrained firms on how to cooperate with one another. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved

Loan portfolio management and Liquidity Risk: The impact of limited liability and haircut

Does limited liability reduce leveraged risk?: The case of loan portfolio management

Stock loans with liquidation

Optimal Liquidity Reserve with Funding Liquidity Risk

Haircutting Non-cash Collateral

Funding Liquidity, Debt Tenor Structure, and Creditor's Belief: An Exogenous Dynamic Debt Run Model

Non-linear Panel Data Liquidity Model of Islamic and Conventional Banks

Liquidity Management with Decreasing-returns-to-scale and Secured Credit Line

Correlated Default Risks and Bank Regulations

Fire Sales, the LOLR and Bank Runs with Continuous Asset Liquidity

Inventory and financial strategies of capital‐constrained firms under limited joint liability financing

Stock loan with Automatic termination clause, cap and margin

Pricing model of stock loan-to-value ratio under various liquidation strategy

Securities Lending Haircuts and Indemnification Pricing

Inventory and Financial Strategies with Capital Constraints and Limited Joint Liability

Robust Optimization of Credit Portfolios

Credit Markets with Time‐Inconsistent Agents and Strategic Loan Default

Risk Management with Variable Capital Utilization and Time-Varying Collateral Capacity

Interbank borrowing and lending between financially constrained banks

Liquidity Stress Testing in Asset Management -- Part 1. Modeling the Liability Liquidity Risk

Risk Modelling on Liquidations with Lévy Processes