Abstract:This article is part of a comprehensive research project on liquidity risk in asset management, which can be divided into three dimensions. The first dimension covers liability liquidity risk (or funding liquidity) modeling, the second dimension focuses on asset liquidity risk (or market liquidity) modeling, and the third dimension considers asset-liability liquidity risk management (or asset-liability matching). The purpose of this research is to propose a methodological and practical framework in order to perform liquidity stress testing programs, which comply with regulatory guidelines (ESMA, 2019) and are useful for fund managers. The review of the academic literature and professional research studies shows that there is a lack of standardized and analytical models. The aim of this research project is then to fill the gap with the goal to develop mathematical and statistical approaches, and provide appropriate answers.
In this first part that focuses on liability liquidity risk modeling, we propose several statistical models for estimating redemption shocks. The historical approach must be complemented by an analytical approach based on zero-inflated models if we want to understand the true parameters that influence the redemption shocks. Moreover, we must also distinguish aggregate population models and individual-based models if we want to develop behavioral approaches. Once these different statistical models are calibrated, the second big issue is the risk measure to assess normal and stressed redemption shocks. Finally, the last issue is to develop a factor model that can translate stress scenarios on market risk factors into stress scenarios on fund liabilities.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is how to conduct liquidity stress tests in asset management. Specifically, the author focuses on the modeling of liability liquidity risk (or funding liquidity). The paper points out that in asset management, liquidity risk is a complex and difficult - to - model type of risk. Compared with market, credit, operational and counterparty risks, there are relatively fewer empirical studies and application methods regarding liquidity risk. Therefore, the author aims to fill this gap by developing mathematical and statistical methods to provide appropriate solutions.
### Main Objectives of the Paper:
1. **Provide a Systematic Methodological Framework**: This framework complies with regulatory guidelines (such as ESMA, 2019) and helps fund managers conduct liquidity stress tests.
2. **Develop Standardized and Analytical Models**: Currently, there is a lack of standardized and analytical models, and the author hopes to fill this vacancy through mathematical and statistical methods.
3. **Understand the True Parameters of Redemption Shocks**: The author proposes several statistical models to estimate redemption shocks and uses zero - inflated models to understand the true parameters that affect redemption shocks.
4. **Distinguish between Aggregate and Individual Models**: In order to develop behavioral models, the author distinguishes between aggregate models and individual - based models.
5. **Evaluate Redemption Shocks under Normal and Stress Conditions**: After calibrating different statistical models, the author needs to determine the risk measures for evaluating redemption shocks under normal and stress conditions.
6. **Develop Factor Models**: This model can transform the stress scenarios of market risk factors into the stress scenarios of fund liabilities.
### Background and Motivation:
- **Driven by the Regulatory Environment**: In recent years, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) have issued multiple regulations on liquidity management, requiring investment funds to manage their liquidity risks.
- **Lessons from the Financial Crisis**: During the 2008 global financial crisis and the 2020 COVID - 19 pandemic, market liquidity deteriorated, causing some investment funds and strategies to face liquidity shocks.
- **The Importance of Liquidity Risk**: Liquidity is not only the focus of regulatory agencies but also a risk that asset managers need to prioritize. Liquidity risk can affect a fund's reputation, the trust of asset owners, and financial performance.
### Methodology:
1. **Historical Approach**: Use historical data to estimate redemption shocks.
2. **Zero - Inflated Model**: Used to understand the true parameters that affect redemption shocks.
3. **Aggregate and Individual Models**: Distinguish between aggregate models and individual - based models to develop behavioral models.
4. **Risk Measures**: Evaluate redemption shocks under normal and stress conditions.
5. **Factor Model**: Transform the stress scenarios of market risk factors into the stress scenarios of fund liabilities.
### Conclusion:
Through the above methods, the author hopes to provide a comprehensive framework to help fund managers better understand and manage liquidity risk. This not only helps meet regulatory requirements but also improves the fund's risk - resistance ability and protects the interests of investors.