Abstract:There is a common expectation that the big-bang singularity must be resolved in quantum gravity but it is not clear how this can be achieved. A major obstacle here is the difficulty of interpreting wave-functions in quantum gravity. The standard quantum mechanical framework requires a notion of time evolution and a proper definition of an invariant inner product having a probability interpretation, both of which are seemingly problematic in quantum gravity. We show that these two issues can actually be solved by introducing the embedding coordinates as dynamical variables à la Isham and Kuchar. The extended theory is identical to general relativity but has a larger group of gauge symmetries. The Wheeler-DeWitt equations describe the change of the wave-function from one arbitrary spacelike slice to another, however the constraint algebra makes this evolution purely kinematical and furthermore enforces the wave-function to be constrained in the subspace of zero-energy states. An inner product can also be introduced having all the necessary requirements. In this formalism big-bang appears as a finite field space boundary on which certain boundary conditions must be imposed for mathematical consistency. We explicitly illustrate this point both in the full theory and in the minisuperspace approximation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is related to the interpretation of the Big Bang singularity in the quantum gravity theory. Specifically, the paper explores how to solve the problems of the definition of time evolution and the definition of invariant inner product in quantum gravity by introducing embedding coordinates as dynamical variables. These two problems are the main obstacles to the interpretation of wave functions in quantum gravity. The author shows that in this way, the Big Bang can be regarded as a finite field - space boundary, and certain boundary conditions are imposed on this boundary to maintain mathematical consistency. This method provides a new perspective to understand the Big Bang singularity, which is different from the traditional view.
### Core problems of the paper
1. **Definition of time evolution**: The framework of standard quantum mechanics requires the concept of time evolution, but in quantum gravity, this concept becomes ambiguous due to the lack of a clear time parameter.
2. **Definition of invariant inner product**: In quantum gravity, there is a lack of an invariant inner product with a probability interpretation, which makes the interpretation of wave functions difficult.
3. **Big Bang singularity**: In classical general relativity, the Big Bang appears as a naked space - like singularity, and the quantum gravity theory should be able to solve this singularity problem.
### Solutions
1. **Introduction of embedding coordinates**: By introducing embedding coordinates as dynamical variables, the configuration space of general relativity is extended. This makes the theory have greater gauge symmetry.
2. **Wheeler - DeWitt equation**: The Wheeler - DeWitt equation in the extended theory describes the change of the wave function from one arbitrary space - like slice to another. This evolution is purely dynamical and forces the wave function to be in the zero - energy state subspace.
3. **Definition of invariant inner product**: In the extended theory, an invariant inner product with a probability interpretation can be defined, thus solving the problem of wave function interpretation.
4. **Big Bang as a boundary condition**: The Big Bang is regarded as a finite field - space boundary, and specific boundary conditions need to be imposed on this boundary to maintain mathematical consistency.
### Mathematical formulas
- **Conditions of embedding coordinates**:
\[
g_{\mu\nu} X'^{\mu} X'^{\nu}<0 \quad \text{and} \quad \det(g_{\mu\nu}\partial_{\alpha} X^{\mu}\partial_{\beta} X^{\nu}) < 0
\]
- **Induced metric**:
\[
h_{ij}=\partial_i X^{\mu}\partial_j X^{\nu}g_{\mu\nu}
\]
- **Constraint equations**:
\[
n^{\nu} P_{\mu\nu} = 0, \quad \partial_i X^{\mu} P_{\mu}+(\partial_i g_{\mu\nu}) P^{\mu\nu}=0, \quad n^{\mu} P_{\mu}+(\delta_n g_{\mu\nu}) P^{\mu\nu}=0
\]
\[
\Phi_i = D_j\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{h}} P^j_i\right)=0, \quad \Phi = 2\sqrt{h}\left(P^{ij} P_{ij}-\frac{1}{2} P^2\right)-\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{h} R^{(3)} = 0
\]
- **Definition of inner product**:
\[
\langle\Psi|\Omega\rangle=\int D h_{ij}\Psi^*[X^{\mu}, h_{ij}]\Omega[X^{\mu}, h_{ij}]
\]
- **Boundary conditions**:
\[
\Psi_D[X^{\mu}(y_i), a(y_i), \gamma_{ij}(y_i)] = 0 \quad \text{when} \quad a(y_i)=0 \quad \e