The evolution of Complexity co-occurring keywords: bibliometric analysis and network approach

Tanya Araújo,Alexandre Abreu,Francisco Louçã

2023-08-02

Abstract:Bibliometric studies based on the Web of Science (WOS) database have become an increasingly popular method for analysing the structure of scientific research. So do network approaches, which, based on empirical data, make it possible to characterize the emergence of topological structures over time and across multiple research areas. Our paper is a contribution to interweaving these two lines of research that have progressed in separate ways but whose common applications have been increasingly more frequent. Among other attributes, Author Keywords and Keywords Plus are used as units of analysis that enable us to identify changes in the topics of interest and related bibliography. By considering the co-occurrence of those keywords with the Author Keyword \texttt{Complexity}, we provide an overview of the evolution of studies on Complexity Sciences, and compare this evolution in seven scientific fields. The results show a considerable increase in the number of papers dealing with complexity, as well as a general tendency across different disciplines for this literature to move from a more foundational, general and conceptual to a more applied and specific set of co-occurring keywords. Moreover, we provide evidence of changing topologies of networks of co-occurring keywords, which are described through the computation of some topological coefficients. In so doing, we emphasize the distinguishing structures that characterize the networks of the seven research areas.

Digital Libraries,Social and Information Networks

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper primarily explores the development and evolution of complexity science research, particularly its manifestations in seven different disciplinary fields. By analyzing the co-occurrence of keywords related to "complexity" in the Web of Science database, the study reveals the changes in the application of the complexity concept within these fields.

The paper attempts to address the following core questions:

1. **Differences in the concept of "complexity" across different disciplines**: The study focuses on how the concept represented by "complexity" as a keyword differs across various disciplines and two distinct time periods (2000-2004 and 2019-2023).

2. **Interdisciplinary differences revealed by co-occurring keywords**: By analyzing the author keywords that co-occur with "complexity," the study explores how these keywords reveal the characteristics of different research fields.

3. **The role of Keywords Plus®**: It examines whether the use of Keywords Plus®, automatically generated by Web of Science, helps to better answer the above questions.

4. **Structural differences in keyword co-occurrence networks across different disciplines**: The study also investigates the topological differences in the author keyword co-occurrence networks in the seven research fields.

To achieve the above objectives, the paper employs quantitative analysis methods, including keyword frequency analysis, co-occurrence analysis, and network analysis. By processing a large amount of literature data from the Web of Science database, the study reveals significant changes over time in how different disciplines understand and apply the concept of complexity, shifting from more fundamental and conceptual research to more specific and application-oriented research directions. Additionally, the paper showcases the unique characteristics and development trends of complexity-related research in different disciplinary fields.