Abstract:In power systems with high penetration of power electronics, grid-forming control is proposed to replace traditional Grid-Following Converter (GFL) in order to improve the overall system strength and resist small-signal instability in weak grids by directly forming the terminal voltage. However, sufficient headroom of both active and reactive power must be made available for Grid-Forming Converter (GFM) to operate, potentially leading to sub-optimal operation in steady states. This presents a new research problem to optimally allocate between GFM and GFL to balance the ability of GFMs to improve the grid strength and the potential economic loss resulting from reserved headroom. An optimization framework under software-defined grids is proposed, for the first time, to dynamically determine the optimal allocation of GFMs and GFLs in power systems at each time step of system scheduling according to system conditions, which ensures both system stability and minimum operational cost. To achieve this, the system scheduling model is expanded to simultaneously consider the constraints related to active and reactive power reserves for GFMs, as well as the system level stability. Case studies conducted on the modified IEEE 30-bus system demonstrate significant economic benefits in that the optimal proportion of GFMs in the power system can be dynamically determined while ensuring power reserve and grid stability constraints.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is in power - electronic devices with high penetration (such as renewable energy generation systems), how to optimally allocate Grid - Forming Control (GFM) and Grid - Following Control (GFL) to balance the need to improve grid strength and the potential economic losses brought by reserving active and reactive power margins. Specifically:
1. **Improve grid stability**: GFM enhances the stability of weak grids and the ability to resist small - signal instabilities by directly forming the terminal voltage.
2. **Optimize operation cost**: In the steady state, GFM needs to reserve sufficient active and reactive power margins, which may lead to sub - optimal operation and economic losses.
3. **Dynamic optimal allocation**: An optimization model under the framework of Software - Defined Grids is proposed to dynamically determine the optimal allocation of GFM and GFL in each dispatch step, ensuring system stability and minimizing operation costs.
### Summary of main research problems
- **How to minimize the economic losses due to reserved power margins while ensuring grid stability?**
- **How to dynamically adjust the proportion of GFM and GFL to adapt to the changes of real - time system conditions?**
### Solutions
The paper proposes an optimization framework based on software - defined grids, which can dynamically determine the optimal allocation of GFM and GFL, specifically including the following aspects:
1. **Active power constraints for frequency regulation and phase - jump response**:
- Active power injection required for frequency regulation:
\[
\Delta P_{fn,j} = 2H_{\text{GFM}, n,j} \frac{\partial \Delta f(t)}{\partial t}, \quad \forall n \in N, \forall j \in F
\]
- Active power injection in phase - jump events:
\[
\Delta P_{phn,j} = E_g V_e \left[\sin(\delta_{n,j} + \Delta \delta_{n,j}) - \sin \delta_{n,j}\right] / X
\]
2. **Reactive power constraints for voltage support services**:
- Reactive current injection during short - circuit faults:
\[
\Delta Q_{vn,j} = V_{tn,j} \Delta I_{rn,j}
\]
- Transient power output constraint in voltage sag events:
\[
\sqrt{(P'_{0n,j} + \Delta P_{vn,j})^2 + (Q'_{0n,j} + \Delta Q_{vn,j})^2} \leq S_{\text{GFM}, n,j}
\]
3. **System stability constraints**:
- Frequency stability constraints (maximum RoCoF and frequency deviation limits):
\[
\dot{\Delta f}|_{t = 0^+} = -\frac{\Delta P_L}{2 \left(H_c + \sum_{j \in F} \sum_{n \in N} H_{\text{GFM}, n,j}\right)}
\]
- Small - signal stability constraints (based on the generalized short - circuit ratio gSCR):
\[
gSCR = \min \lambda(Y_{\text{eq}}) \geq C_{gSCR}
\]
where \( Y_{\text{eq}} = S_B^{-1}(B_r + A Y_{\text{local}}) \)
Through these optimization and constraint conditions, the paper shows how to achieve the optimal GFM and GFL under the premise of ensuring grid stability.