Abstract:Background and objective: Competing risks data arise in both observational and experimental clinical studies with time-to-event outcomes, when each patient might follow one of the multiple mutually exclusive competing paths. Ignoring competing risks in the analysis can result in biased conclusions. In addition, possible confounding bias of the treatment-outcome relationship has to be addressed, when estimating treatment effects from observational data. In order to provide tools for estimation of average treatment effects on time-to-event outcomes in the presence of competing risks, we developed the R package causalCmprsk. We illustrate the package functionality in the estimation of effects of a right heart catheterization procedure on discharge and in-hospital death from observational data. Methods: The causalCmprsk package implements an inverse probability weighting estimation approach, aiming to emulate baseline randomization and alleviate possible treatment selection bias. The package allows for different types of weights, representing different target populations. causalCmprsk builds on existing methods from survival analysis and adapts them to the causal analysis in non-parametric and semi-parametric frameworks. Results: The causalCmprsk package has two main functions: fit.cox assumes a semiparametric structural Cox proportional hazards model for the counterfactual cause-specific hazards, while fit.nonpar does not impose any structural assumptions. In both frameworks, causalCmprsk implements estimators of (i) absolute risks for each treatment arm, e.g., cumulative hazards or cumulative incidence functions, and (ii) relative treatment effects, e.g., hazard ratios, or restricted mean time differences. The latter treatment effect measure translates the treatment effect from probability into more intuitive time domain and allows the user to quantify, for example, by how many days or months the treatment accelerates the recovery or postpones illness or death. Conclusions: The causalCmprsk package provides a convenient and useful tool for causal analysis of competing risks data. It allows the user to distinguish between different causes of the end of follow-up and provides several time-varying measures of treatment effects. The package is accompanied by a vignette that contains more details, examples and code, making the package accessible even for non-expert users.

An R package for parametric estimation of causal effects

CausalMetaR: An R package for performing causally interpretable meta-analyses

causalBETA: An R Package for Bayesian Semiparametric Causal Inference with Event-Time Outcomes

Conducting Simulations in Causal Inference with Networks-Based Structural Equation Models

Bayesian Nonparametric Modeling for Causal Inference

Inferring causal impact using Bayesian structural time-series models

A Practical Introduction to Bayesian Estimation of Causal Effects: Parametric and Nonparametric Approaches

Estimating complex causal effects from incomplete observational data

Matching as Nonparametric Preprocessing for Reducing Model Dependence in Parametric Causal Inference

The Econometric Model for Causal Policy Analysis

High Precision Causal Model Evaluation with Conditional Randomization

causalCmprsk: An R package for nonparametric and Cox-based estimation of average treatment effects in competing risks data

Causal inference using graphical models with the R package pcalg

A Two-Step Framework for Validating Causal Effect Estimates

Causal modelling without introducing counterfactuals or abstract distributions

Causal Inference in the Social Sciences

What can the millions of random treatments in nonexperimental data reveal about causes?

Credible causal inference beyond toy models

The Causal Roadmap and Simulations to Improve the Rigor and Reproducibility of Real-data Applications

Introduction to computational causal inference using reproducible Stata, R, and Python code: A tutorial

Package ‘pcalg’