Abstract:The critical importance of justifying the inclusion of covariates is a facet often overlooked in data analysis. While the incorporation of covariates typically follows informal guidelines, we argue for a comprehensive exploration of underlying principles to avoid significant statistical and interpretational challenges. Our focus is on addressing three common yet problematic practices: the indiscriminate lumping of covariates, the lack of rationale for covariate inclusion, and the oversight of potential issues in result reporting. These challenges, prevalent in neuroimaging models involving covariates such as reaction time, demographics, and morphometric measures, can introduce biases, including overestimation, underestimation, masking, sign flipping, or spurious effects. Our exploration of causal inference principles underscores the pivotal role of domain knowledge in guiding covariate selection, challenging the common reliance on statistical measures. This understanding carries implications for experimental design, model-building, and result interpretation. We draw connections between these insights and reproducibility concerns, specifically addressing the selection bias resulting from the widespread practice of strict thresholding, akin to the logical pitfall associated with "double dipping." Recommendations for robust data analysis involving covariates encompass explicit research question statements, justified covariate inclusions/exclusions, centering quantitative variables for interpretability, appropriate reporting of effect estimates, and advocating a "highlight, don't hide" approach in result reporting. These suggestions are intended to enhance the robustness, transparency, and reproducibility of covariate-driven analyses, encompassing investigations involving consortium datasets such as ABCD and UK Biobank. We discuss how researchers can use a transparent depiction of the covariate relationships to enhance the ethos of open science and promote research reproducibility.

The Causal Roadmap and Simulations to Improve the Rigor and Reproducibility of Real-data Applications

An Application of the Causal Roadmap in Two Safety Monitoring Case Studies: Covariate-Adjustment and Outcome Prediction using Electronic Health Record Data

Causal inference for psychologists who think that causal inference is not for them

Credible causal inference beyond toy models

Formulating causal questions and principled statistical answers

A biologist's guide to model selection and causal inference

Causal Inference and Counterfactual Prediction in Machine Learning for Actionable Healthcare

Through the lens of causal inference: Decisions and pitfalls of covariate selection

Introduction to computational causal inference using reproducible Stata, R, and Python code: A tutorial

Automated versus do-it-yourself methods for causal inference: Lessons learned from a data analysis competition

Testing Causality in Scientific Modelling Software

Using causal inference to avoid fallouts in data-driven parametric analysis: a case study in the architecture, engineering, and construction industry

Methods and tools for causal discovery and causal inference

A Causal Roadmap for Generating High-Quality Real-World Evidence

A Two-Step Framework for Validating Causal Effect Estimates

Enhancing inferences and conclusions in body image focused non-experimental research via a causal modelling approach: A tutorial

Statistical Approaches for Causal Inference

A Survey of Causal Inference Frameworks

An Evaluation Toolkit to Guide Model Selection and Cohort Definition in Causal Inference

Smoke and Mirrors in Causal Downstream Tasks

Matching as Nonparametric Preprocessing for Reducing Model Dependence in Parametric Causal Inference