Unveiling the anatomy of mode-coupling theory

I. Pihlajamaa,V.E. Debets,C.C.L. Laudicina,L.M.C. Janssen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhys.15.5.217

2023-10-27

Abstract:The mode-coupling theory of the glass transition (MCT) has been at the forefront of fundamental glass research for decades, yet the theory's underlying approximations remain obscure. Here we quantify and critically assess the effect of each MCT approximation separately. Using Brownian dynamics simulations, we compute the memory kernel predicted by MCT after each approximation in its derivation, and compare it with the exact one. We find that some often-criticized approximations are in fact very accurate, while the opposite is true for others, providing new guiding cues for further theory development.

Statistical Mechanics,Materials Science,Soft Condensed Matter,Chemical Physics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to evaluate and quantify the validity of each approximation in the Mode - Coupling Theory (MCT), especially the accuracy of these approximations when describing the glass - transition dynamics. MCT is an important theoretical framework for studying the glass transition, but its internal approximation treatments have always been not transparent enough. The author calculated the memory kernel predicted after each approximate step in the derivation process of MCT through Brownian dynamics simulations and compared it with the exact memory kernel. Specifically, the paper focuses on the following aspects:

1. **Ignoring Projection Dynamics**: This refers to ignoring the influence of the orthogonal projection \(Q''\) in the time - evolution operator. This approximation assumes that the time evolution of the memory kernel can be described by the standard Smoluchowski dynamics without considering the influence of the projection. The paper evaluated the influence of this approximation on the memory kernel and the intermediate scattering function.

2. **Density - Doublet Projection**: This is to project the memory kernel onto the density - doublet space. The density - doublet refers to the product of two density modes \(\rho_q\rho_{q'}\). This approximation assumes that the density - doublet is the most important dynamic observable and can explain the main mechanism of structural relaxation. The paper evaluated the effect of this approximation, especially its influence on the diagonalization treatment of the static four - point structure factor.

3. **Diagonalization**: This refers to retaining only the diagonal terms in the four - point function \(F^{(4)}\) and ignoring all non - diagonal terms. This approximation simplifies the treatment of the four - point function but may introduce large errors. The paper evaluated the influence of this approximation on the memory kernel and the intermediate scattering function and found that it significantly reduces the value of the memory kernel and accelerates the relaxation time.

4. **Factorization**: This refers to factorizing the four - point function \(F^{(4)}\) into the product of two two - point functions. This approximation further simplifies the theory, enabling it to be self - consistently solved. The paper evaluated the effect of this approximation, especially its performance at different temperatures.

5. **Convolution Approximation**: This refers to using the convolution form in the time integral of the memory kernel. This approximation assumes that the time correlation of the memory kernel can be described by the convolution form. The paper evaluated the effect of this approximation, especially its performance on a long - time scale.

Through these analyses, the paper aims to reveal the advantages and disadvantages of each approximation in MCT and provide guidance for the future development of the theory. In particular, the paper found that some approximations that are often criticized are actually quite accurate, while other approximations have large errors. This provides new clues and directions for improving MCT.