Abstract:Gravitational-wave (GW) observations of binary black-hole (BBH) coalescences are expected to address outstanding questions in astrophysics, cosmology, and fundamental physics. Realizing the full discovery potential of upcoming LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA (LVK) observing runs and new ground-based facilities hinges on accurate waveform models. Using linear-signal approximation methods and Bayesian analysis, we start to assess our readiness for what lies ahead using two state-of-the-art quasi-circular, spin-precessing models: \texttt{SEOBNRv5PHM} and \texttt{IMRPhenomXPHM}. We ascertain that current waveforms can accurately recover the distribution of masses in the LVK astrophysical population, but not spins. We find that systematic biases increase with detector-frame total mass, binary asymmetry, and spin-precession, with most such binaries incurring parameter biases, extending up to redshifts $\sim3$ in future detectors. Furthermore, we examine three ``golden'' events characterized by large mass ratios, significant spin magnitudes, and high precession, evaluating how systematic biases may affect their scientific outcomes. Our findings reveal that current waveforms fail to enable the unbiased measurement of the Hubble-Lemaître parameter from loud signals, even for current detectors. Moreover, highly asymmetric systems within the lower BH mass-gap exhibit biased measurements of the secondary-companion mass, which impacts the physics of both neutron stars and formation channels. Similarly, we deduce that the primary mass of massive binaries ($ > 60 M_\odot$) will also be biased, affecting supernova physics. Future progress in analytical calculations and numerical-relativity simulations, crucial for calibrating the models, must target regions of the parameter space with significant biases to develop more accurate models. Only then can precision GW astronomy fulfill the promise it holds.

What You Don't Know Can Hurt You: Use and Abuse of Astrophysical Models in Gravitational-wave Population Analyses

Are all models wrong? Falsifying binary formation models in gravitational-wave astronomy

Systematic Biases in Estimating the Properties of Black Holes Due to Inaccurate Gravitational-Wave Models

Detecting the Undetected: Overcoming Biases in Gravitational-Wave Population Studies

Stochastic gravitational-wave background as a tool to investigate multi-channel astrophysical and primordial black-hole mergers

Constraining Formation Models of Binary Black Holes with Gravitational-Wave Observations

Stochastic gravitational wave background from binary black hole mergers dynamically assembled in dense star clusters

One to many: comparing single gravitational-wave events to astrophysical populations

On the Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background from Binary Black Hole Mergers Dynamically Assembled in Dense Star Clusters

Growing Pains: Understanding the Impact of Likelihood Uncertainty on Hierarchical Bayesian Inference for Gravitational-Wave Astronomy

Comparing gravitational waveform models for binary black hole mergers through a hypermodels approach

Probabilistic Model for the Gravitational Wave Signal from Merging Black Holes

A Trifecta of Modelling Tools: A Bayesian Binary Black Hole Model Selection combining Population Synthesis and Galaxy Formation Models

Impact of gravitational waveform model systematics on the measurement of the Hubble constant

Distinguishing compact binary population synthesis models using gravitational-wave observations of coalescing binary black holes

Astrophysical Uncertainties in the Gravitational-Wave Background from Stellar-Mass Compact Binary Mergers

Incorporating model accuracy into gravitational-wave Bayesian inference

Estimating astrophysical population properties using a multicomponent stochastic gravitational-wave background search

The origin channels of hierarchical binary black hole mergers in the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA O1, O2, and O3 runs

Importance of stable mass transfer and stellar winds for the formation of gravitational wave sources