Abstract:Gravitational-wave observations have the capability to strongly differentiate between different assumptions for how binary compact objects form. In this work, we show how to carefully interpolate a marginal likelihood between choices of binary evolution model parameters. Using the StarTrack binary evolution code, we compare one- and four-dimensional binary evolution models to the compact binary mergers reported in recent gravitational-wave observing runs. We first consider a one-dimensional model, studying the effect of supernova kick velocity (drawn from a Maxwellian with dispersion {\sigma}_eff) on the simulated population of compact binary mergers, and find support for substantial SN recoil kicks. We follow this up with a four-dimensional study of {\sigma}_eff, mass transfer efficiency (fa) and the efficiency of angular momentum depletion from ejected material (\b{eta}) during Roche-lobe accretion, and an observation-driven reduction in the mass-loss rate estimated from stellar wind models (fwind1). We find that three of them ({\sigma}_eff, fa, and fwind1) can be efficiently limited by these observational comparisons. After initially sampling from a uniform prior in the space of these parameters, we refined our sampling by iteratively estimating a Bayesian likelihood for each simulation and fitting that likelihood to a parametric model (a truncated Gaussian) in order to propose new. Our maximum likelihood simulation (K0559) has parameters: {\sigma}_eff = 108.3 km/s (indicating substantial SN recoil kicks), fa = 0.922 (indicating efficient mass transfer), and fwind1 = 0.328 (indicating support for reduced wind-driven mass loss). Note that our estimates are only valid within one particular model of compact binary formation through isolated binary evolution and do not yet take into account the impact of other uncertain pieces of stellar physics and binary evolution.

One to many: comparing single gravitational-wave events to astrophysical populations

Are all models wrong? Falsifying binary formation models in gravitational-wave astronomy

What You Don't Know Can Hurt You: Use and Abuse of Astrophysical Models in Gravitational-wave Population Analyses

Distinguishing compact binary population synthesis models using gravitational-wave observations of coalescing binary black holes

Importance of stable mass transfer and stellar winds for the formation of gravitational wave sources

On combining information from multiple gravitational wave sources

Searching for binary black hole sub-populations in gravitational wave data using binned Gaussian processes

Detecting the Undetected: Overcoming Biases in Gravitational-Wave Population Studies

A novel approach to infer population and cosmological properties with gravitational waves standard sirens and galaxy surveys

Statistical properties of astrophysical gravitational-wave backgrounds

Gravitational wave populations and cosmology with neural posterior estimation

Comparing gravitational waveform models for binary black hole mergers through a hypermodels approach

Backward Population Synthesis: Mapping the Evolutionary History of Gravitational-Wave Progenitors

Iteratively Comparing Gravitational-Wave Observations to the Evolution of Massive Stellar Binaries

Gravitational waves carry information beyond effective spin parameters but it is hard to extract

A physically modelled selection function for compact binary mergers in the LIGO-Virgo O3 run and beyond

Background information: a study on the sensitivity of astrophysical gravitational-wave background searches

A Trifecta of Modelling Tools: A Bayesian Binary Black Hole Model Selection combining Population Synthesis and Galaxy Formation Models