Abstract:I evaluate the performance of estimators that exploit regional variation in wage levels to identify the employment and wage effects of national minimum wage laws. For the "effective minimum wage" design, I show that the identification assumptions in Lee (1999) are difficult to satisfy in settings without regional minimum wages. For the "fraction affected" design, I show that economic factors such as skill-biased technical change or regional convergence may cause parallel trends violations and should be investigated using pre-treatment data. I also show that this design is subject to misspecification biases that are not easily solved with changes in specification.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to evaluate the effectiveness of using regional wage level differences to identify the impact of national minimum wage laws on employment and wages. Specifically, the author Daniel Haanwinckel explores two main design methods: the "effective minimum wage" design and the "affected proportion" design, and whether these two methods can accurately capture the causal effects of the minimum wage on employment and wages in the absence of differences in regional minimum wage regulations.
### Main research questions:
1. **Identification assumptions of the effective minimum wage design**:
- The paper points out that the two key identification assumptions proposed by Lee (1999) are difficult to meet in practical applications. These two assumptions are:
- **Assumption 1**: The observed median log - wage is a good proxy for the center of the potential log - wage distribution.
- **Assumption 2**: The overall wage level is not correlated with the dispersion of the potential log - wage distribution across different regions.
- Through economic theory and simulation experiments, the author shows that these assumptions are difficult to meet in the absence of differences in regional minimum wage regulations, resulting in estimation bias.
2. **Identification assumptions of the affected proportion design**:
- The author discusses the key identification assumption of the "affected proportion" design, that is, in the counterfactual scenario without a national minimum wage increase, the outcome trend should be orthogonal to the treatment intensity variable used, conditional on the control variables and fixed effects used in the design.
- The author points out three potential problems:
- **Structural factors**: Skill - biased technological change, for example, may lead to a violation of the parallel trend assumption.
- **Mean reversion**: Due to sampling variation and region - specific productivity shocks, regional wage statistics may have mean reversion bias.
- **Function form selection**: Improper selection of the function form of the treatment intensity variable may lead to model misspecification bias, especially when the minimum wage is more binding or causes more workers to earn slightly above the minimum wage.
### Solutions and diagnostic tools:
- **Effective minimum wage design**:
- Potential solutions include using higher wage quantiles to construct the effective minimum wage, or changing the fixed effects and trends in the regression.
- The author points out that unless there is an economic factor that can change the "bite" of the minimum wage in some regions, is independent of employment outcomes and the shape of the log - wage distribution, and has sufficient residual variance, this design is difficult to recover the true causal effect.
- **Affected proportion design**:
- Potential solutions include testing pre - difference trends, controlling for mean reversion, and using one treatment intensity variable as an instrument variable for another.
- The author finds that these methods may be effective in some cases, but usually cannot completely solve the problem of model misspecification.
### Conclusion:
Through in - depth analysis of the "effective minimum wage" design and the "affected proportion" design, the paper reveals the potential problems and limitations of these methods in identifying the impact of national minimum wage laws on employment and wages. The author suggests that researchers should be cautious when using these methods and consider using other instrumental variable methods or more diagnostic tools to improve the accuracy of the estimates.