Abstract:The polar precursor method is widely considered to be the most robust physically motivated method to predict the amplitude of an upcoming solar <a class="link-external link-http" href="http://cycle.It" rel="external noopener nofollow">this http URL</a> uses indicators of the magnetic field concentrated near the poles around sunspot minimum. Here, we present an extensive performance analysis of various such predictors, based on both observational data (WSO magnetograms, MWO polar faculae counts and Pulkovo $A(t)$ index) and outputs (polar cap magnetic flux and global dipole moment) of various existing flux transport dynamo <a class="link-external link-http" href="http://models.We" rel="external noopener nofollow">this http URL</a> calculate Pearson correlation coefficients ($r$) of the predictors with the next cycle amplitude as a function of time measured from several solar cycle landmarks: setting $r= 0.8$ as a lower limit for acceptable predictions, we find that observations and models alike indicate that the earliest time when the polar predictor can be safely used is 4 years after polar field reversal. This is typically 2--3 years before solar minimum and about 7~years before the predicted maximum, considerably extending the {usual} temporal scope of the polar precursor method. Re-evaluating the predictors another 3 years later, at the time of solar minimum, further increases the correlation level to $r\ga 0.9$. As an illustration of the result, we determine the predicted amplitude of Cycle 25 based on the value of the WSO polar field at the now official minimum date of December 2019 as $126\pm 3$. A forecast based on the value in early 2017, 4~years after polar reversal would have only differed from this final prediction by $3.1\pm 14.7$\%.

Discovery of a relation between the decay rate of the Sun's magnetic dipole and the growth rate of the following sunspot cycle: a new precursor for solar cycle prediction

Solar Cycle Propagation, Memory, and Prediction: Insights from a Century of Magnetic Proxies

Overlapping Magnetic Activity Cycles and the Sunspot Number: Forecasting Sunspot Cycle 25 Amplitude

A robust correlation between growth rate and amplitude of solar cycles: consequences for prediction methods

Turbulent Pumping of Magnetic Flux Reduces Solar Cycle Memory and thus Impacts Predictability of the Sun's Activity

Maximal growth rate of the ascending phase of a sunspot cycle for predicting its amplitude

Sunspot number second differences as a precursor of the following 11-year sunspot cycle

Forecasting the solar activity cycle: new insights

Predictability of the solar cycle over one cycle

Physical Models for Solar Cycle Predictions

The polar precursor method for solar cycle prediction: comparison of predictors and their temporal range

Exploring the reliability of polar field rise rate as a precursor for an early prediction of solar cycle

Search for relationship between duration of the extended solar cycles and amplitude of sunspot cycle

Algebraic Quantification of the Contribution of Active Regions to the Sun's Dipole Moment: Applications to Century-scale Polar Field Estimates and Solar Cycle Forecasting

Improvement of solar cycle prediction: Plateau of solar axial dipole moment

Prediction of solar activities: Sunspot numbers and solar magnetic synoptic maps

An Interesting Correlation Between the Peak Slope and Peak Value of a Sunspot Cycle

A Remarkably Accurate Predictor of Sunspot Cycle Amplitude

Cyclic variations in the main components of the solar large-scale magnetic field

A Dynamo-Based Prediction of Solar Cycle 25

A Model of the Double Magnetic Cycle of the Sun