Abstract:The polar precursor method is widely considered to be the most robust physically motivated method to predict the amplitude of an upcoming solar <a class="link-external link-http" href="http://cycle.It" rel="external noopener nofollow">this http URL</a> uses indicators of the magnetic field concentrated near the poles around sunspot minimum. Here, we present an extensive performance analysis of various such predictors, based on both observational data (WSO magnetograms, MWO polar faculae counts and Pulkovo $A(t)$ index) and outputs (polar cap magnetic flux and global dipole moment) of various existing flux transport dynamo <a class="link-external link-http" href="http://models.We" rel="external noopener nofollow">this http URL</a> calculate Pearson correlation coefficients ($r$) of the predictors with the next cycle amplitude as a function of time measured from several solar cycle landmarks: setting $r= 0.8$ as a lower limit for acceptable predictions, we find that observations and models alike indicate that the earliest time when the polar predictor can be safely used is 4 years after polar field reversal. This is typically 2--3 years before solar minimum and about 7~years before the predicted maximum, considerably extending the {usual} temporal scope of the polar precursor method. Re-evaluating the predictors another 3 years later, at the time of solar minimum, further increases the correlation level to $r\ga 0.9$. As an illustration of the result, we determine the predicted amplitude of Cycle 25 based on the value of the WSO polar field at the now official minimum date of December 2019 as $126\pm 3$. A forecast based on the value in early 2017, 4~years after polar reversal would have only differed from this final prediction by $3.1\pm 14.7$\%.

A robust correlation between growth rate and amplitude of solar cycles: consequences for prediction methods

Maximal growth rate of the ascending phase of a sunspot cycle for predicting its amplitude

Exploring the predictability of the solar cycle from the polar field rise rate: Results from observations and simulations

Predicting the solar maximum with the rising rate

The polar precursor method for solar cycle prediction: comparison of predictors and their temporal range

Long-term Variability in the Length of the Solar Cycle

Discovery of a relation between the decay rate of the Sun's magnetic dipole and the growth rate of the following sunspot cycle: a new precursor for solar cycle prediction

A prediction for the 25th solar cycle maximum amplitude

Revisiting the prediction of solar activity based on the relationship between the solar maximum amplitude and max-max cycle length

Forecast and backcast of the solar cycles

Sunspot number second differences as a precursor of the following 11-year sunspot cycle

Exploring the reliability of polar field rise rate as a precursor for an early prediction of solar cycle

Predictions of the Maximum Amplitude, Time of Occurrence, and Total Length of Solar Cycle 24

Predictability of the solar cycle over one cycle

Reinforcing the double dynamo model with solar-terrestrial activity in the past three millennia

Forecasting the solar modulation potential: Tests of time series models

Understanding solar cycle variability

A Dynamo-Based Prediction of Solar Cycle 25

Robustness of Solar-Cycle Empirical Rules Across Different Series Including an Updated Active-Day Fraction (ADF) Sunspot Group Series

Overlapping Magnetic Activity Cycles and the Sunspot Number: Forecasting Sunspot Cycle 25 Amplitude

An Interesting Correlation Between the Peak Slope and Peak Value of a Sunspot Cycle