Abstract:Machine learning potentials (MLPs) offer the potential to accurately model the energy and free energy landscapes of molecules with the precision of quantum mechanics and an efficiency similar to classical simulations. This research focuses on using equivariant graph neural networks MLPs due to their proven effectiveness in modeling equilibrium molecular trajectories. A key issue addressed is the capability of MLPs to accurately predict free energies and transition states by considering both the energy and the diversity of molecular configurations. We examined how the distribution of collective variables (CVs) in the training data affects MLP accuracy in determining the free energy surface (FES) of systems, using Metadynamics simulations for butane and alanine dipeptide (ADP). The study involved training forty-three MLPs, half based on classical molecular dynamics data and the rest on ab initio computed energies. The MLPs were trained using different distributions that aim to replicate hypothetical scenarios of sampled CVs obtained if the underlying FES of the system was unknown. Findings for butane revealed that training data coverage of key FES regions ensures model accuracy regardless of CV distribution. However, missing significant FES regions led to correct potential energy predictions but failed free energy reconstruction. For ADP, models trained on classical dynamics data were notably less accurate, while ab initio-based MLPs predicted potential energy well but faltered on free energy predictions. These results emphasize the challenge of assembling an all-encompassing training set for accurate FES prediction and highlight the importance of understanding the FES in preparing training data. The study points out the limitations of MLPs in free energy calculations, stressing the need for comprehensive data that encompasses the system's full FES for effective model training.

Discrepancies and Error Evaluation Metrics for Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials

Discrepancies and error evaluation metrics for machine learning interatomic potentials

Learning from models: high-dimensional analyses on the performance of machine learning interatomic potentials

Considerations in the use of ML interaction potentials for free energy calculations

Hydrogen under Pressure as a Benchmark for Machine-Learning Interatomic Potentials

Transferable Performance of Machine Learning Potentials Across Graphene-Water Systems of Different Sizes: Insights from Numerical Metrics and Physical Characteristics.

Accuracy Assessment of Atomistic Neural Network Potentials: The Impact of Cutoff Radius and Message Passing

Correcting force error-induced underestimation of lattice thermal conductivity in machine learning molecular dynamics

Developing General Reactive Element-Based Machine Learning Potentials as the Main Computational Engine for Heterogeneous Catalysis

Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials and Long-Range Physics

Exploring Model Complexity in Machine Learned Potentials for Simulated Properties

Machine Learning of Reactive Potentials

Transferability evaluation of the deep potential model for simulating water-graphene confined system

Refining Potential Energy Surface through Dynamical Properties via Differentiable Molecular Simulation

A Hessian-Based Assessment of Atomic Forces for Training Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials

Towards a Generalizable Machine-Learned Potential for Metal-Organic Frameworks

Data-Efficient Construction of High-Fidelity Graph Deep Learning Interatomic Potentials

Insight into the effect of force error on the thermal conductivity from machine-learned potentials

Tell machine learning potentials what they are needed for: Simulation-oriented training exemplified for glycine

Improving machine learning force fields for molecular dynamics simulations with fine-grained force metrics

Machine learning interatomic potential: Bridge the gap between small-scale models and realistic device-scale simulations