Dark energy-matter equivalence by the evolution of cosmic equation of state

Anna Chiara Alfano,Carlo Cafaro,Salvatore Capozziello,Orlando Luongo
2023-08-30
Abstract:We consider a model-independent approach to constrain the equivalence redshift, $z_{eq}$, at which dark energy and the total matter (cold dark matter and baryonic) equate their magnitudes. To this aim, in the context of a homogeneous and isotropic universe, we first consider a generic model where the dark energy contribution is provided by an unknown function of barotropic fluids. Afterwards, we compute the deceleration and jerk parameters, evaluating at our epoch, namely $z=0$, and at $z=z_{eq}$. Thus, by Taylor expanding around current time the Hubble rate, luminosity and angular distances, we substitute the theoretical expressions obtained from the aforementioned generic dark energy model, defining a correspondence between quantities evaluated at $z=0$ and $z=z_{eq}$. In so doing, we directly fit these quantities by means of current data sets, involving the most recent Pantheon type Ia supernovae, baryonic acoustic oscillation and Hubble rate points. We consider two hierarchies in our fitting procedures and compare our findings in the spatially-flat universe first and including spatial curvature, later. We assess constraints on the overall equation of state of the universe and its first derivative. We compare our results with those predicted by the standard $\Lambda$CDM paradigm. Specifically, our findings are in agreement at the 2$\sigma$ confidence level, assuming a constant dark energy term. However, our analysis does not rule out the possibility of a slight evolution of dark energy, indicating a small deviation from the scenario of a pure cosmological constant. In particular, the possible departures appear consistent with a phenomenological $\omega$CDM model, rather than more complicated dark energy parameterizations.
Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics,General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### The problems the paper attempts to solve This paper aims to explore the conditions for dark energy and total matter (cold dark matter and baryons) in the universe to reach equal amounts at redshift \( z_{\text{eq}} \). Specifically, the author adopts a model - independent method to constrain this equivalent redshift \( z_{\text{eq}} \) and conducts research in a homogeneous and isotropic cosmic background. ### Main methods and steps 1. **General dark energy model**: - The author first assumes that the dark energy contribution is described by an unknown redshift function \( G(z) \). - By calculating the deceleration parameter \( q \) and the jerk parameter \( j \), and evaluating these parameters at the current time \( z = 0 \) and the equivalent redshift \( z = z_{\text{eq}} \). 2. **Cosmological reconstruction**: - By Taylor - expanding the Hubble rate, luminosity distance, and angular diameter distance near the current time, and substituting the theoretical expressions into the above - mentioned general dark energy model. - Defining the correspondence between the quantities at \( z = 0 \) and \( z = z_{\text{eq}} \), and directly fitting these quantities using the current data sets (such as the recent Pantheon Type Ia supernovae, baryon acoustic oscillations, and Hubble rate points). 3. **Data comparison**: - Considering two levels of fitting procedures, and comparing them in a flat universe and a universe with spatial curvature respectively. - Evaluating the constraints on the overall equation of state of the universe and its first - order derivative, and comparing the results with the standard ΛCDM model. ### Main findings - **Comparison with the ΛCDM model**: - The research results are consistent with the ΛCDM model assuming a constant dark energy term at the 2σ confidence level. - However, the analysis does not rule out the possibility of a slight evolution of dark energy, indicating that dark energy may deviate slightly from a pure cosmological constant. - **Dark energy evolution**: - The possible deviation is consistent with the ωCDM model rather than more complex dark energy parameterization models. ### Formula display 1. **Hubble parameter**: \[ H(z) = H_0 \sqrt{\Omega_m (1 + z)^3 + \Omega_k (1 + z)^2 + \Omega_{\text{DE}} G(z)} \] 2. **Deceleration parameter \( q(z) \)**: \[ q(z) = -1+\frac{(1 + z)[3\Omega_m (1 + z)^2+\Omega_{\text{DE}} G'(z)]}{2[\Omega_m (1 + z)^3+\Omega_{\text{DE}} G(z)]} \] 3. **Jerk parameter \( j(z) \)**: \[ j(z)=\frac{2\Omega_{\text{DE}} G(z)+(1 + z)[-2\Omega_{\text{DE}} G'(z)+(1 + z)(2\Omega_m (1 + z)+\Omega_{\text{DE}} G''(z))]}{2[\Omega_m (1 + z)^3+\Omega_{\text{DE}} G(z)]} \] 4. **Equivalent redshift \( z_{\text{eq}} \)**: \[ \Omega_{\text{DE}} G(z_{\text{eq}})=\Omega_m (1 + z_{\text{eq}})^3+\Omega_k (1 + z_{\text{eq}})^2 \]