Abstract:Cosmological observational programs often compare their data not only with Lambda cold dark matter (Lambda CDM), but also with extensions applying dynamical models of dark energy (DE), whose time-dependent equation of state (EoS) parameters $w$ differ from that of a cosmological constant. We found a degeneracy in the customary computational procedure for the expansion history of cosmological models once dynamical models of DE models were applied. This degeneracy, given the Planck-based Hubble constant $H_0$, provides an infinite number of cosmological models reproducing the Planck-measured cosmic microwave background (CMB) spectrum, including the one with a cosmological constant. Moreover, this degeneracy biases the comparison of Lambda CDM with dynamical DE extensions. We present a complementary computational approach, that breaks this degeneracy in the computation of the expansion history of models with a dynamical DE component: the fixed early densities (EDs) approach evolves cosmological models from the early Universe to the present, in contrast to the customary fixed $H_0$ approach, which evolves cosmological models in reverse order. Although there are no equations to determine these EDs from first principles, we find they are accurately approximated by the Lambda CDM model. We implemented a refined procedure, applying both approaches, in an amended version of the code CLASS, where we focused on representative dynamical DE models using the Chevallier-Polarski-Linder (CPL) parametrization, studying cases with monotonically increasing and decreasing $w$ over cosmic time. Our results reveal that a dynamical DE model with a decreasing $w$ of the form $w(a)=-0.9 + 0.1(1-a)$ could provide a resolution to the Hubble tension problem. Moreover, we find that combining the fixed EDs approach and the customary fixed $H_0$ approach, while requesting to yield consistent results and being in agreement with observations across cosmic time, can serve as a kind of consistency check for cosmological models with a dynamical model of DE. Finally, we argue that implementing our proposed consistency check for cosmological models within current Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods will increase the accuracy of inferred cosmological parameters significantly, in particular for extensions to Lambda CDM. Using our complementary computational scheme, we find characteristic signatures in the late expansion histories of cosmological models, allowing a phenomenological discrimination of DE candidates and a possible resolution to the Hubble tension, by ongoing and future observational programs.

Eliminating the Hubble Tension in the Presence of the Interconnection between Dark Energy and Matter in the Modern Universe

On the interacting dark energy scenarios $-$ the case for Hubble constant tension

Possible modification to standard cosmological model to resolve tension with Hubble constant values

Towards a possible solution to the Hubble tension with Horndeski gravity

The Hubble Tension and Early Dark Energy

Phantom matter: a challenging solution to the cosmological tensions

The Ups and Downs of Early Dark Energy solutions to the Hubble tension: a review of models, hints and constraints circa 2023

Decaying Dark Matter and the Hubble Tension

Cascading Dark Energy

A Step in understanding the Hubble tension

Alleviating cosmological tensions with a hybrid dark sector

Reconciling Cosmological Tensions with Inelastic Dark Matter and Dark Radiation in a $\boldsymbol{U(1)_D}$ Framework

Can interacting dark energy with dynamical coupling resolve the Hubble tension

Interacting dark energy: clarifying the cosmological implications and viability conditions

Constraining Holographic Dark Energy and Analyzing Cosmological Tensions

Acceleration of the Universe without the Hubble tension with Kaniadakis holographic dark energy using the Hubble horizon as the IR cut-off

Restoring cosmological concordance with axion-like early dark energy and dark matter characterized by a constant equation of state?

A proposal to improve the accuracy of cosmological observables and address the Hubble tension problem