A Game-Theoretic Framework for AI Governance

Na Zhang,Kun Yue,Chao Fang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.14865

2023-05-24

Abstract:As a transformative general-purpose technology, AI has empowered various industries and will continue to shape our lives through ubiquitous applications. Despite the enormous benefits from wide-spread AI deployment, it is crucial to address associated downside risks and therefore ensure AI advances are safe, fair, responsible, and aligned with human values. To do so, we need to establish effective AI governance. In this work, we show that the strategic interaction between the regulatory agencies and AI firms has an intrinsic structure reminiscent of a Stackelberg game, which motivates us to propose a game-theoretic modeling framework for AI governance. In particular, we formulate such interaction as a Stackelberg game composed of a leader and a follower, which captures the underlying game structure compared to its simultaneous play counterparts. Furthermore, the choice of the leader naturally gives rise to two settings. And we demonstrate that our proposed model can serves as a unified AI governance framework from two aspects: firstly we can map one setting to the AI governance of civil domains and the other to the safety-critical and military domains, secondly, the two settings of governance could be chosen contingent on the capability of the intelligent systems. To the best of our knowledge, this work is the first to use game theory for analyzing and structuring AI governance. We also discuss promising directions and hope this can help stimulate research interest in this interdisciplinary area. On a high, we hope this work would contribute to develop a new paradigm for technology policy: the quantitative and AI-driven methods for the technology policy field, which holds significant promise for overcoming many shortcomings of existing qualitative approaches.

Computer Science and Game Theory,Computers and Society

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper attempts to address the issue of how to establish an effective AI governance framework to ensure that AI development is safe, fair, and aligned with human values. Specifically, the paper introduces the Stackelberg game model from game theory to analyze and model the strategic interactions between regulators and AI enterprises, thereby proposing a unified AI governance framework.

### Background of the Paper
With the widespread application of AI technology, the enormous benefits it brings are accompanied by a series of risks, such as safety issues and ethical concerns. Therefore, establishing an effective AI governance mechanism becomes particularly important. However, existing governance methods are mostly qualitative, lacking systematic and quantitative analysis. The authors of the paper believe that through game theory, especially the Stackelberg game model, AI governance strategies can be better understood and designed.

### Main Contributions
1. **Introduction of the Stackelberg Game Model**: The interaction between regulators and AI enterprises is abstracted as a Stackelberg game, where one party acts as the leader (acting first) and the other as the follower (acting later).
2. **Proposing a Unified Governance Framework**: Based on the Stackelberg game model, a unified AI governance framework is proposed. This framework can integrate various existing governance insights and provide a systematic model to understand the complex dynamics of AI regulation.
3. **Instantiation of the Theoretical Framework**: Two specific categories—Incentive Games and Stackelberg MDP—are demonstrated to prove the generality and flexibility of the framework.

### Model Setup
- **Participants**:
- **AI Enterprises**: Aim to maximize the returns from AI technology innovation and application.
- **Regulators**: Aim to minimize the potential risks brought by AI R&D and deployment while incentivizing AI innovation.

- **Objective Functions**:
- **AI Enterprises**: Maximize returns \( J(\mu(\pi), c(\mu, \omega)) \), where \(\pi\) is the enterprise's AI development strategy, \(\mu\) is the AI performance metric, and \(c\) is the regulatory cost.
- **Regulators**: Minimize losses \( L(\mu(\pi), \omega) \), where \(\omega\) is the regulatory standard.

### Stackelberg Game Forms
Based on the leader's choice, the paper proposes two forms of the Stackelberg governance framework:

1. **AI Enterprises as Leaders**:
\[
\max_{\pi \in \Pi} J(\mu(\pi), c(\mu, \omega^*(\pi))) \quad \text{s.t.} \quad \omega^*(\pi) \in \arg\min_{\tilde{\omega} \in \Omega} L(\mu(\pi), \tilde{\omega})
\]

2. **Regulators as Leaders**:
\[
\min_{\omega \in \Omega} L(\mu(\pi^*), \omega) \quad \text{s.t.} \quad \pi^*(\omega) = \arg\max_{\tilde{\pi} \in \Pi} J(\mu(\tilde{\pi}), c(\mu(\tilde{\pi}), \omega))
\]

### Governance Settings in Different Fields
- **Civilian Sector**: Choose AI enterprises as leaders, suitable for the governance of civilian AI technology.
- **Safety-Critical and Military Sectors**: Choose regulators as leaders, suitable for the governance of AI in safety-critical and military fields.

### Conclusion
By introducing the Stackelberg game model, the paper provides a new perspective to understand and design AI governance frameworks. This framework not only integrates various existing governance insights but also automatically balances the effectiveness and safety of AI innovation, opening new directions for future technology policy research.