Poincare and Einstein on Mass-Energy Equivalence: A Modern Perspective on their 1900 and 1905 Papers

Patrick Moylan

2023-05-20

Abstract:Both Poincaré in his 1900 Festschrift paper \cite{Poincare} and Einstein in his 1905 \textsl{Annalen der Physik} article \cite{Einstein} were led to $E=mc^2$ by considering electromagnetic processes taking place in vacuo. Poincaré's treatment is based on a generalization of the law of conservation of momentum to include radiation. Einstein's analysis relies solely on energy conservation and the relativity principle together with certain assumptions, which have served as the source of criticism of the paper beginning with Max Planck in 1907. We show that these objections raised by Planck and others can be traced back to Einstein's failure to make use of momentum considerations. Relevance of our findings to a proper understanding of Ives' criticism of Einstein's paper is pointed out.

History and Philosophy of Physics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the logical and methodological disputes regarding the mass - energy equivalence relation \(E = mc^2\) in Einstein's 1905 paper. Specifically, the paper focuses on:

1. **Criticisms of Einstein's paper by Planck and Ives**: Planck put forward criticisms of Einstein's 1905 paper in 1907, believing that there were logical problems in its derivation process. Ives further developed these criticisms in later papers, pointing out that Einstein's derivation might rely on petitio principii (circular reasoning).

2. **The importance of conservation of momentum**: The paper emphasizes the importance of conservation of momentum in deriving the mass - energy equivalence relation. The author believes that Einstein's derivation was based only on the conservation of energy and the principle of relativity, ignoring the influence of conservation of momentum, which led to ambiguity and potential logical errors in his derivation.

3. **Re - evaluating Einstein's method**: The paper re - evaluates Einstein's method by conducting a comparative analysis of the approaches of Poincaré and Einstein. Poincaré derived the mass - energy equivalence relation in his 1900 paper by considering the conservation of momentum in electromagnetic processes. In contrast, although Einstein's method ultimately reached the same result, there were certain deficiencies in his derivation process.

4. **Responding to defenses in support of Einstein**: The paper also responds to the views of some defenders in support of Einstein, such as Stachel, Torretti and Field. These defenders believe that Einstein's paper was basically correct, but through detailed analysis, the author of the paper points out that these defenses have not completely resolved the core issues of Ives' criticisms.

In short, the main purpose of this paper is to re - evaluate the derivation process of the mass - energy equivalence relation in Einstein's 1905 paper by detailed analysis and comparison of the methods of Poincaré and Einstein, and to point out the logical problems and methodological deficiencies therein.