$E=mc^2$ versus Symmetry for Lorentz Covariant Physics

Otto C.W. Kong,Hock King Ting

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjph.2023.04.008

2023-05-16

Abstract:The famous equation $E=mc^2$ is a version of particle mass being essentially the magnitude of the (energy-)momentum four-vector in the setting of `relativistic' dynamics, which can be seen as dictated by the Poincaré symmetry adopted as the relativity symmetry. However, as Einstein himself suggested, the naive notion of momentum as mass times velocity may not be right. The Hamiltonian formulation perspective gives exactly such a setting which in the case of motion of a charged particle under an electromagnetic field actually has the right, canonical, momentum four-vector with an evolving magnitude. The important simple result seems to have missed proper appreciation. In relation to that, we present clear arguments against taking the Poincaré symmetry as the fundamental symmetry behind `relativistic' quantum dynamics, and discuss the proper symmetry theoretical formulation and the necessary picture of the covariant Hamiltonian dynamics with an evolution parameter that is, in general, not a particle proper time. In fact, it is obvious that the action of any position operator of a quantum state violates the on-shell mass condition. The phenomenologically quite successful quantum field theories are `second quantized' versions of `relativistic' quantum mechanics. We present a way for some reconciliation of that with our symmetry picture and discuss implications.

Quantum Physics,High Energy Physics - Theory

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problems that this paper attempts to solve mainly focus on the re - evaluation of the fundamental symmetries in "relativistic" quantum dynamics. In particular, it challenges the traditional view that regards Poincaré symmetry as the fundamental symmetry in Lorentz - covariant physics. Specifically, the paper explores the following core issues:

1. **The relationship between \(E = mc^{2}\) and symmetry**: The paper questions whether Poincaré symmetry is the correct symmetry for describing "relativistic" dynamics (both classical and quantum). The author points out that although \(E = mc^{2}\) is a well - known equation, the definition of momentum behind it (that is, momentum equals mass times velocity) may not be accurate. From the perspective of Hamiltonian dynamics, the motion of a charged particle in an electromagnetic field actually has a time - varying momentum four - vector, which contradicts the concept of a fixed momentum four - vector under the traditional Poincaré symmetry.

2. **The limitations of Poincaré symmetry**: The paper proposes that Poincaré symmetry has limitations as the fundamental symmetry of "relativistic" quantum dynamics. By analyzing the motion of a charged particle in an electromagnetic field, the author shows that the "on - shell" mass condition (\(p_{\mu}p^{\mu}=-m^{2}c^{2}\)) under Poincaré symmetry may not hold in actual physical situations. This indicates that Poincaré symmetry may not be the best choice for describing these systems.

3. **The introduction of HR(1, 3) symmetry**: In order to overcome the limitations of Poincaré symmetry, the paper introduces a larger symmetry - HR(1, 3) symmetry. HR(1, 3) symmetry can not only avoid contradictions with the results of electrodynamics, but also provides a consistent Lorentz - covariant quantum mechanics framework. The author discusses in detail the mathematical structure of HR(1, 3) symmetry and its application in quantum mechanics, especially its performance in multi - particle systems.

4. **The influence on quantum field theory**: The paper also discusses the influence of this new symmetry perspective on quantum field theory. Although quantum field theory is very successful in describing the results of high - energy physics experiments, they are usually regarded as the "second quantization" version of "relativistic" quantum mechanics. If "relativistic" quantum mechanics needs to be modified based on a new symmetry, then quantum field theory may also need to be re - evaluated. The author presents some preliminary ideas on how to reconcile these theories through HR(1, 3) symmetry.

In summary, the core objective of this paper is to re - evaluate and improve the fundamental symmetry framework of "relativistic" quantum dynamics. In particular, it aims to solve the problems existing in the existing theories by introducing HR(1, 3) symmetry. This will not only help to better understand the basic laws of physics, but may also provide new directions for future theoretical development.