Large eddy simulation of a low-pressure turbine cascade with turbulent end wall boundary layers

Christian Morsbach,Michael Bergmann,Adem Tosun,Bjoern F. Klose,Edmund Kügeler,Matthias Franke

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10494-023-00502-6

2023-05-02

Abstract:We present results of implicit large eddy simulation (LES) and different Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) models of the MTU 161 low pressure turbine at an exit Reynolds number of 90,000 and exit Mach number of 0.6. The LES results are based on a high order discontinuous Galerkin method and the RANS is computed using a classical finite-volume approach. The paper discusses the steps taken to create realistic inflow boundary conditions in terms of end wall boundary layer thickness and free stream turbulence intensity. This is achieved by tailoring the input distribution of total pressure and temperature, Reynolds stresses and turbulent length scale to a Fourier series based synthetic turbulence generator. With this procedure, excellent agreement with the experiment can be achieved in terms of blade loading at midspan and wake total pressure losses at midspan and over the channel height. Based on the validated setup, we focus on the discussion of secondary flow structures emerging due to the interaction of the incoming boundary layer and the turbine blade and compare the LES to two commonly used RANS models. Since we are able to create consistent setups for both LES and RANS, all discrepancies can be directly attributed to physical modelling problems. We show that both a linear eddy viscosity model and a differential Reynolds stress model coupled with a state-of-the-art correlation-based transition model fail, in this case, to predict the separation induced transition process around midspan. Moreover, their prediction of secondary flow losses leaves room for improvement as shown by a detailed discussion turbulence kinetic energy and anisotropy fields.

Fluid Dynamics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem this paper attempts to address is: using Large Eddy Simulation (LES) and different Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) models to study the impact of the turbulent endwall boundary layer on secondary flow structures in a low-pressure turbine blade passage. Specifically, the authors focus on how to create realistic inlet boundary conditions, including endwall boundary layer thickness and free-stream turbulence intensity, and validate the performance of LES and RANS models under these conditions in predicting blade loading, wake total pressure loss, and secondary flow characteristics.

### Background and Problem
1. **Aeroengine Efficiency**: Increasing the bypass ratio of turbofan engines can enhance engine efficiency but will lead to larger secondary flow regions, which significantly increase overall aerodynamic losses.
2. **Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Methods**: Low-fidelity CFD methods like RANS have limitations in predicting these losses, necessitating higher-fidelity methods to improve understanding.
3. **Large Eddy Simulation (LES)**: LES can resolve relevant turbulence length and time scales, providing detailed unsteady flow physics, but due to high computational costs, it has only been widely applied in recent years.

### Research Objectives
1. **Create Realistic Inlet Boundary Conditions**: By adjusting the input distributions of total pressure, temperature, Reynolds stress, and turbulence length scales, generate a Fourier series-based synthetic turbulence generator to achieve high consistency with experimental data.
2. **Validate LES and RANS Models**: Under validated settings, compare the performance of LES and two commonly used RANS models (Linear Eddy Viscosity Model LEVM and Differential Reynolds Stress Model DRSM) in predicting midspan and endwall flow characteristics.
3. **Analyze Secondary Flow Structures**: Focus on the secondary flow structures generated by the interaction between the incoming boundary layer and the turbine blade, particularly the separation-induced transition process and secondary flow losses at midspan.

### Methods
1. **LES Method**: Use a high-order Discontinuous Galerkin (DG) method for LES to resolve the compressible Navier-Stokes equations.
2. **RANS Method**: Use the classical finite volume method for RANS calculations, employing the Menter SST k-ω model and the SSG/LRR-ω model.
3. **Boundary Conditions**: Determine the development of the inlet boundary layer and free-stream turbulence decay through precursor channel flow simulations to ensure consistency with experimental data.

### Results and Discussion
1. **Consistency of LES with Experiments**: LES results show high consistency with experimental data in terms of blade midspan loading and wake total pressure loss.
2. **Performance of RANS Models**: LEVM and DRSM show deficiencies in predicting the midspan separation-induced transition process and secondary flow losses, with DRSM performing particularly poorly in predicting shear stress.
3. **Secondary Flow Structures**: Detailed discussion of turbulent kinetic energy and anisotropy fields, demonstrating the differences between LES and RANS models in predicting secondary flow structures.

Through these studies, the authors aim to provide high-quality reference data for the flow in low-pressure turbine blade passages and evaluate the applicability and accuracy of different CFD methods.