Who are the gatekeepers of economics? Geographic diversity, gender composition, and interlocking editorship of journal boards

Alberto Baccini,Cristina Re

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09538259.2024.2303654

2024-01-07

Abstract:This study investigates the role of editorial board members as gatekeepers in science, creating and utilizing a database of 1,516 active economics journals in 2019, which includes more than 44,000 scholars from over 6,000 institutions and 142 countries. The composition of these editorial boards is explored in terms of geographic affiliation, institutional affiliation, and gender. Results highlight that the academic publishing environment is primarily governed by men affiliated with elite universities in the United States. The study further explores social similarities among journals using a network analysis perspective based on interlocking editorship. Comparison of networks generated by all scholars, editorial leaders, and non-editorial leaders reveals significant structural similarities and associations among clusters of journals. These results indicate that links between pairs of journals tend to be redundant, and this can be interpreted in terms of social and intellectual homophily within each board, and between boards of journals belonging to the same cluster. Finally, the analysis of the most central journals and scholars in the networks suggests that journals probably adopt 'strategic decisions' in the selection of the editorial board members. The documented high concentration of editorial power poses a serious risk to innovative research in economics.

General Economics,Digital Libraries,Physics and Society

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper primarily explores the role of editorial board members of economics journals as scientific "gatekeepers" by constructing a database of 1,516 active economics journals. These journals encompass over 44,000 scholars from more than 6,000 institutions and 142 countries. The study aims to reveal the distribution of editorial board members in terms of geographical affiliation, institutional affiliation, and gender composition.

The paper attempts to address the following issues:

1. **Analysis of Editorial Board Members' Characteristics**: Investigating the distribution characteristics of editorial board members in terms of geographical affiliation, institutional affiliation, and gender composition. The results show that male scholars from the United States dominate, especially those affiliated with elite universities.

2. **Social Network Analysis of Editorial Boards**: Exploring the social similarity between different journals by analyzing the situation of editors serving on multiple journals (i.e., "cross-appointment networks"). The study finds that this phenomenon of cross-appointment leads to highly redundant links between journals, which can be explained as social and knowledge homogeneity within and across editorial boards.

3. **Journal Cluster Analysis**: Using social network analysis methods to identify journal clusters formed by cross-appointments. The study indicates that despite different groups of scholars (such as all scholars, editorial leaders, or non-editorial leaders), the structural similarity and association between journals remain significant.

4. **Analysis of Central Journals and Scholars**: Identifying the most central journals and scholars in the network to reveal the distribution of influence in the academic publishing field. The study points out that a few journals and editors hold substantial power, which may pose a serious risk to innovative research in the field of economics.

In summary, the paper reveals potential issues in the academic publishing environment through a comprehensive analysis of the editorial board members of economics journals, including the high concentration of power that may lead to the suppression of innovation and the resulting challenges to diversity and inclusion.