Abstract:We first consider the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) paradox for the system of two particles with spin 1/2 with entangled spins in first-quantized quantum mechanics (QM). If measurement is governed by wavefunction collapse, then gedanken experiments show that a number of fundamental principles including conservation of angular momentum and the Heisenberg uncertainty principle can be violated. We conclude that the collapse of the spin part of the wavefunction cannot happen and therefore an EPR paradox does not arise for this system. QM unitarity alone is sufficient to rule out "spooky" action at a distance. The absence of spin wavefunction collapse leads to several interesting conclusions about how measurement works in QM: When wavefunction collapse does not happen, (i) a signal from a macroscopic measuring device indicating that a system is in a state S does not necessarily mean that it is or was in S and (ii) the uncertainty in QM at the microscopic level is transmitted to uncertainty in signals for the macroscopic measuring device. We derive two general results on how quantum measurement works and illustrate them in a spin-1/2 measurement. In contrast to first-quantized QM, in quantum field theory we are unable to fully rule out the possibility of wavefunction collapse. However, when we insist on unitarity (thereby excluding the possibility of wavefunction collapse) and additionally take into account in the wavefunction all degrees of freedom involved in the measurement (including those of the equipment, experimentalists, etc.), a consistant acceptable understanding of the Bell-inequality-type experiments involving entangled photon polarizations emerges including the absence of an EPR paradox. The ability of an experimentalist to be aware of his perceptions but unable to be conscious of other components of a generalized Schrodinger Cat plays a role in resolving the Measurement Problem.

No-go for fully unitary quantum mechanics from Bell's Theorem; comment on "Physics and Metaphysics of Wigner's Friends: Even performed pre-measurements have no results''

Unitary Interactions Do Not Yield Outcomes: Attempting to Model "Wigner's Friend"

A possibilistic no-go theorem on the Wigner's friend paradox

Wigner and his many friends: A new no-go result?

Events in quantum mechanics are maximally non-absolute

Against Bell's Theorem

Extended Wigner's friend paradoxes do not require nonlocal correlations

Making sense of relativistic Wigner friend scenarios: a problem for unitary accounts of quantum measurements ?

Bell vs Bell: a ding-dong battle over quantum incompleteness

Allowing Wigner's friend to sequentially measure incompatible observables

Against (unitary) interpretation (of quantum mechanics): removing the metaphysical load

Bell's theorem tells us NOT what quantum mechanics IS, but what quantum mechanics IS NOT

The Frauchiger-Renner Gedanken Experiment: Flaws in Its Analysis -- How Logic Works in Quantum Mechanics

Testing an Einstein's intuitive objection to quantum mechanics

Bell's Experiment in Quantum Mechanics and Classical Physics

On Wavefunction Collapse, the Einstein-Poldolsky-Rosen Paradox and Measurement in Quantum Mechanics and Field Theory

Relational Quantum Mechanics is Still Incompatible with Quantum Mechanics

A "thoughtful" Local Friendliness no-go theorem: a prospective experiment with new assumptions to suit

After Bell

On Removing the Classical-Quantum Boundary

On modifications of Reichenbach's principle of common cause in light of Bell's theorem