Privacy Considerations for Online Advertising: A Stakeholder’s Perspective to Programmatic Advertising
Dylan Cooper,Taylan Yalcin,Cristina Nistor,Matthew Macrini,Ekin Pehlivan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4012936
2021-01-01
SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract:Purpose: Privacy considerations have become a topic with increasing interest from academics, industry leaders, and regulators. In response to consumers’ privacy concerns, Google announced in 2020 that Chrome would stop supporting third-party cookies in the near future. At the same time, advertising technology companies are developing alternative solutions for online targeting and consumer privacy controls. In this paper, we explore privacy considerations related to online tracking and targeting methods used for programmatic advertising (i.e., third-party cookies, Privacy Sandbox, Unified ID 2.0) for a variety of stakeholders: consumers, AdTech platforms, advertisers, and publishers.Design/methodology/approach: We analyze the topic of internet user privacy concerns, through a multi-pronged approach: industry conversations to collect information, a comprehensive review of trade publications, and extensive empirical analysis. We use two methods to collect data on consumer preferences for privacy controls: a survey of a representative sample of US consumers and field data from conversations on web-forums created by tech professionals. Findings: Our results suggest that there are four main segments in the US internet user population. The first segment, consisting of 26% of internet users, is driven by a strong preference for relevant ads and includes consumers who accept the premises of both Privacy Sandbox and UID 2.0. The second segment (26%) includes consumers who are ambivalent about both sets of premises. The third segment (34%) is driven by a need for relevant ads and a strong desire to prevent advertisers from aggressively collecting data, with consumers who accept the premises of Privacy Sandbox but reject the premises of UID 2.0. The fourth segment (15% of consumers) rejected both sets of premises about privacy control. Text analysis results suggest that the conversation around UID 2.0 is still nascent. Google Sandbox associations seem nominally positive, with sarcasm being an important factor in the sentiment analysis results. Originality: The value of this paper lies in its multi-method examination of online privacy concerns in light of the recent regulatory legislation (i.e., GDPR and CCPA) and changes for third-party cookies in browsers such as Firefox, Safari, and Chrome. Two alternatives proposed to replace third-party cookies (Privacy Sandbox and Unified ID 2.0) are in the proposal and prototype stage. The elimination of third-party cookies will affect stakeholders, including different types of players in the AdTech industry and internet users. We analyze how two alternative proposals for privacy control align with the interests of several stakeholders.